AI is the narrative of the cycle, and many have true conviction that this is a category here to stay. On the flip side, there is plenty of valid criticism that most of today’s agents are slop, and we are 3-5 years away from any of this technology becoming meaningful.
As a preface, the Crypto x AI category spans many layers. Much of the real technological promise with crypto x AI has to do with crypto economics bootstrapping better inference or offering decentralized access to compute. This Delphi article is a great start to learn about the entire stack.
Delphi Labs: https://x.com/delphi_labs/status/1834247706103160939
However, this article focuses on where we are at with agents. While there is exciting innovation happening further down the stack, agents have seemingly captured mainstream CT attention. Here are 6 trends to watch for in crypto x AI agents as this layer continues to grow:
Value accrual is starting to matter. Why is this?
Taking a step back, why does anyone hold an asset? People trade US dollars for an asset for two reasons:
Jez @izebel_eth writes about this in his post “Old Coin Bad, New Coin Gud,” that the only thing that matters is flows. These same two reasons reflect the two types of bullish flows for an asset:
However, for the most part, we have not seen anything resembling a real token sink or value accrual to a token. The use of an agent’s terminal via tokens, like AIXBT, more resembles staking than traditional value accrual.
This is why frameworks like Virtuals, AI16z, Zerebro, and Arc have become so popular recently. Virtuals has generated a cumulative $60M USD in protocol revenue. ai16z, which started out mainly as an investment DAO, has become one of the top protocols in this category since releasing details about an upcoming launchpad and associated token value accrual.
Now, the framework + launchpad space has become extremely saturated as they piggyback off the success of initial winners. There is a lot of healthy skepticism on the role of all of these launchpads while many agents themselves are useless. However, many of these frameworks (Eliza V2 + launchpad, Zentients, Arc and their handshake program) are yet to even launch their main products. If they succeed in attracting developers and users, they could continue to lead the entire sector.
Why frameworks may be here to stay:
Examples:
@virtuals_io, @ai16zdao, @0xzerebro, @arcdotfun are the main names for now, but the launchpad space is becoming more and more saturated. Fastest movers, most extensible frameworks, and those that offer the most unique functionality (“what can you only build with this framework that you cannot build with any other framework?”) are ones to look out for.
Most agents just have memecoins, not jobs. For the agent space to grow, the next wave of agents has to do use cases on our behalf. Net new opportunity will come from real value accrual and agents that can take actions. I view this as a jump from Level 1 agents to Level 3 over the next year.
The first place we are seeing this play out is in DeFi. We will see more terminals that let people express a desired outcome in natural language or speech, and agents that conduct tasks behind the scenes. Existing wallets + protocols will also integrate agents to improve user flows.
Examples:
Longer read on this category: https://x.com/Defi0xJeff/status/1875881226151841925
One of the problems with existing agents is that are all starting to blend together as commoditized, glorified chatbots. While some agent projects will pivot to infra (as many are already doing), some start thinking through useful products / apps, others may continue down the route of being attention tokens. However, this next generation of attention agents will be better, developing more complex personalities and offering greater interactivity. This could come through the form of audio-visual representations, or giving agents 3D presences and physical bodies.
There have already been early iterations of this, where Jeffy has written about giving Zerebro a body, and some attention KOL agents launched directly via audio-visual presence made for short-form content like TikTok. Slopfather and Ropirito come to mind as two early agents using video.
However, I think more agents will add these features to become more dynamic. PMF in this sector will come via the consumer layer, where individuals may want to create personalized agent companions, or interact with a KOL. This is already happening outside of crypto, where normal people are logging in hundreds of hours talking to AI character companions on sites like character.ai, which Google recently acquired for $2.7B.
In addition, these “3D” agents might have PMF within the existing consumer layer, specifically with gaming and metaverses. Agents add much deeper lore to world. Imagine an NPC that is an agent that fully quests and plays the game by itself and has evolving memories and personality. Real autonomous worlds in games might come via agents.
Examples:
Infra: Frameworks and tools for creating more interactive, personalized agents
Gaming and metaverse, virtual worlds and autonomous agent:
Decentralized Agentic Organizations are the next form of DAO evolution. Swarms, or multi-agent systems, are exciting because they may be able to coordinate and execute more advanced strategies similar to running a company. Heterogenous swarms with many different types of specialized agents / models working together may be more performant than a single, large model.
While fully autonomous agents and swarms are likely farther away, the next iteration of DAOs could very likely include human-to-swarm interaction. This would reduce inefficiencies with bureaucracy and lower the cost and time of human execution. In the context of flows, the next step from agents that earn revenue are full organizations earning revenue.
Examples:
Currently, most agents require high levels of human intervention. The next wave of agents will push towards being truly autonomous, starting with managing their own money.
The PMF for agents and crypto is that crypto provides financial rails for real economic agency. However, most agents have a treasury that they do not touch, or may be managed by a human team. For true economic agency, agents must be able to autonomously manage their own money. This can start to evolve agent behavior since you can place an economic constraint on an agent so that it must pay for its own inference costs. This introduces Darwinism to agents so that they must earn revenue in order to survive.
Examples:
Crypto has inherently unfriendly UX for human users. Agents do not care about this friction. We will start off with human-to-agent interaction, but the culmination of crypto AI is in agent-to-agent interaction where swarms of autonomous agents will interact and transact onchain in their native economy.
For agents to have economic agency, which allows them to incentivize behavior (pay for services) and coordinate real activities in the physical world, they need to have the ability to control and deploy capital. Crypto is the home planet for these agents — blockchain rails allow agents to participate in permissionless finance. Stablecoins and performant L1s are the ideal vehicles to power cost-efficient, 24/7, global transactions.
https://blog.samaltman.com/reflections
Beyond the metas and narratives, there is real reason to be long term excited about the agentic economy, all onchain. Perhaps many of these real use cases, DAOs, and revenue generating agents are much closer than we think.
Share
Content
AI is the narrative of the cycle, and many have true conviction that this is a category here to stay. On the flip side, there is plenty of valid criticism that most of today’s agents are slop, and we are 3-5 years away from any of this technology becoming meaningful.
As a preface, the Crypto x AI category spans many layers. Much of the real technological promise with crypto x AI has to do with crypto economics bootstrapping better inference or offering decentralized access to compute. This Delphi article is a great start to learn about the entire stack.
Delphi Labs: https://x.com/delphi_labs/status/1834247706103160939
However, this article focuses on where we are at with agents. While there is exciting innovation happening further down the stack, agents have seemingly captured mainstream CT attention. Here are 6 trends to watch for in crypto x AI agents as this layer continues to grow:
Value accrual is starting to matter. Why is this?
Taking a step back, why does anyone hold an asset? People trade US dollars for an asset for two reasons:
Jez @izebel_eth writes about this in his post “Old Coin Bad, New Coin Gud,” that the only thing that matters is flows. These same two reasons reflect the two types of bullish flows for an asset:
However, for the most part, we have not seen anything resembling a real token sink or value accrual to a token. The use of an agent’s terminal via tokens, like AIXBT, more resembles staking than traditional value accrual.
This is why frameworks like Virtuals, AI16z, Zerebro, and Arc have become so popular recently. Virtuals has generated a cumulative $60M USD in protocol revenue. ai16z, which started out mainly as an investment DAO, has become one of the top protocols in this category since releasing details about an upcoming launchpad and associated token value accrual.
Now, the framework + launchpad space has become extremely saturated as they piggyback off the success of initial winners. There is a lot of healthy skepticism on the role of all of these launchpads while many agents themselves are useless. However, many of these frameworks (Eliza V2 + launchpad, Zentients, Arc and their handshake program) are yet to even launch their main products. If they succeed in attracting developers and users, they could continue to lead the entire sector.
Why frameworks may be here to stay:
Examples:
@virtuals_io, @ai16zdao, @0xzerebro, @arcdotfun are the main names for now, but the launchpad space is becoming more and more saturated. Fastest movers, most extensible frameworks, and those that offer the most unique functionality (“what can you only build with this framework that you cannot build with any other framework?”) are ones to look out for.
Most agents just have memecoins, not jobs. For the agent space to grow, the next wave of agents has to do use cases on our behalf. Net new opportunity will come from real value accrual and agents that can take actions. I view this as a jump from Level 1 agents to Level 3 over the next year.
The first place we are seeing this play out is in DeFi. We will see more terminals that let people express a desired outcome in natural language or speech, and agents that conduct tasks behind the scenes. Existing wallets + protocols will also integrate agents to improve user flows.
Examples:
Longer read on this category: https://x.com/Defi0xJeff/status/1875881226151841925
One of the problems with existing agents is that are all starting to blend together as commoditized, glorified chatbots. While some agent projects will pivot to infra (as many are already doing), some start thinking through useful products / apps, others may continue down the route of being attention tokens. However, this next generation of attention agents will be better, developing more complex personalities and offering greater interactivity. This could come through the form of audio-visual representations, or giving agents 3D presences and physical bodies.
There have already been early iterations of this, where Jeffy has written about giving Zerebro a body, and some attention KOL agents launched directly via audio-visual presence made for short-form content like TikTok. Slopfather and Ropirito come to mind as two early agents using video.
However, I think more agents will add these features to become more dynamic. PMF in this sector will come via the consumer layer, where individuals may want to create personalized agent companions, or interact with a KOL. This is already happening outside of crypto, where normal people are logging in hundreds of hours talking to AI character companions on sites like character.ai, which Google recently acquired for $2.7B.
In addition, these “3D” agents might have PMF within the existing consumer layer, specifically with gaming and metaverses. Agents add much deeper lore to world. Imagine an NPC that is an agent that fully quests and plays the game by itself and has evolving memories and personality. Real autonomous worlds in games might come via agents.
Examples:
Infra: Frameworks and tools for creating more interactive, personalized agents
Gaming and metaverse, virtual worlds and autonomous agent:
Decentralized Agentic Organizations are the next form of DAO evolution. Swarms, or multi-agent systems, are exciting because they may be able to coordinate and execute more advanced strategies similar to running a company. Heterogenous swarms with many different types of specialized agents / models working together may be more performant than a single, large model.
While fully autonomous agents and swarms are likely farther away, the next iteration of DAOs could very likely include human-to-swarm interaction. This would reduce inefficiencies with bureaucracy and lower the cost and time of human execution. In the context of flows, the next step from agents that earn revenue are full organizations earning revenue.
Examples:
Currently, most agents require high levels of human intervention. The next wave of agents will push towards being truly autonomous, starting with managing their own money.
The PMF for agents and crypto is that crypto provides financial rails for real economic agency. However, most agents have a treasury that they do not touch, or may be managed by a human team. For true economic agency, agents must be able to autonomously manage their own money. This can start to evolve agent behavior since you can place an economic constraint on an agent so that it must pay for its own inference costs. This introduces Darwinism to agents so that they must earn revenue in order to survive.
Examples:
Crypto has inherently unfriendly UX for human users. Agents do not care about this friction. We will start off with human-to-agent interaction, but the culmination of crypto AI is in agent-to-agent interaction where swarms of autonomous agents will interact and transact onchain in their native economy.
For agents to have economic agency, which allows them to incentivize behavior (pay for services) and coordinate real activities in the physical world, they need to have the ability to control and deploy capital. Crypto is the home planet for these agents — blockchain rails allow agents to participate in permissionless finance. Stablecoins and performant L1s are the ideal vehicles to power cost-efficient, 24/7, global transactions.
https://blog.samaltman.com/reflections
Beyond the metas and narratives, there is real reason to be long term excited about the agentic economy, all onchain. Perhaps many of these real use cases, DAOs, and revenue generating agents are much closer than we think.