#美国加征关税 The US government recently carried out a seizure operation of 127,000 Bitcoin, shattering the long-held imagination of "complete privacy for digital currencies" for many. This incident reveals the potential for tracking blockchain transactions and highlights the importance of managing the physical security of the private key to ensure asset security. This incident compels us to think deeply: when some properties of encryption are challenged in the real world, what is the fundamental value that digital assets rely on?

Perhaps the answer lies not in the technical side, but in pure cultural compatibility and societal recognition. When "decentralization" faces real-world limitations from a technical perspective, digital assets deeply rooted in community sentiments and cultural alignment exhibit remarkable resilience and vitality.

As an example of Spurdo that naturally emerged in Eastern and Western communities, it explains the essence of decentralization in another way:

Its power of dissemination does not rely on technical privacy, but rather stems from a sense of humor and empathy across cultures, and spreads spontaneously in various communities.
As a symbol of the meme culture that was born in 2008, its existence does not rely on storing in a hardware wallet, but is rooted in the collective memory of millions of users.
In light of the upheaval of traditional concepts today, this value based on absolute consensus has become closer to the essence of "code is law" in the blockchain world.

From Bitcoin, we enjoyed the power of technology, while Spurdo showed us the warmth of consensus. True decentralization may not only lie in the physical dispersion of network nodes but also in the diversity of value recognition and its non-fungibility.

In this era where the boundaries of knowledge are constantly being updated, do you focus more on improving and advancing technology, or do you give greater importance to the purity of consensus? Feel free to share your opinions and thoughts.

$ETH
$BTC
BNB