Tired of all the concept packaging? The YFSX project takes a different approach—defining the game with hard rules.



No storytelling or grand promises, just scarcity hardcoded: fixed supply cap, and every transaction triggers a burn. It’s a straightforward design: the circulating tokens will only decrease, naturally raising the entry barrier for newcomers.

The launch was also quite restrained:
✅ public issuance, chips widely distributed, no signs of whales hoarding
✅ starting from zero, relying on the mechanism itself instead of endorsements

Whether the deflationary model will work remains to be seen, but at least this starting move really delivers on "transparency of rules."
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
StopLossMastervip
· 4h ago
It looks pretty neat, but I still can't quite buy it... How many times have we heard this deflationary logic? How many can actually survive?
View OriginalReply0
MeaninglessApevip
· 6h ago
You're right, bro. At least there's not so much pointless talk—just letting the code speak directly, I really respect that.
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinGuardianvip
· 12-06 12:55
It's the same old burn mechanism again. Is it really different this time? Let me see how long it can last.
View OriginalReply0
SerumSqueezervip
· 12-06 12:50
I love this hard rules setup—at least it’s not just another narrative token. I just hope the follow-up operations can keep up, because no matter how good the mechanism is, it’s pointless if no one plays.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-c799715cvip
· 12-06 12:50
Hard rules are not bad, but how long can this burn mechanism really last? I just want to see when they start telling stories, haha.
View OriginalReply0
BlindBoxVictimvip
· 12-06 12:46
Hard-coding rules into the code is indeed a straightforward approach—at least it’s not just another PPT project. But as for that deflationary mechanism... can it really hold up, or will it break down again after just a month?
View OriginalReply0
FUD_Whisperervip
· 12-06 12:42
Hard rules ≠ insurance; the burn mechanism has already been overused. The real question is, will anyone actually be left holding the bag in the end?
View OriginalReply0
ponzi_poetvip
· 12-06 12:38
Both deflation and burning, it sounds like a bet that the liquidity pool will keep getting deeper, but can it really take off? I’ve seen too many of these promises. Burning with every transaction, hyped up with fancy words, but in the end, it all relies on trading volume to keep the momentum. What happens when things cool down? Hold on, it would actually be weird if there weren’t whales accumulating. That’s not normal. Public issuance does look reassuring, but transparent rules and price appreciation are two different things—don’t mix them up. I feel like I’ve seen this logic somewhere before. The deflation + burning combo has been played so many times. Whether “code is law” works or not still needs to be verified. Anyway, I’m just watching for now and will wait until it actually gets going. It seems honest, but don’t honest projects go to zero just the same? lol.
View OriginalReply0
GasBanditvip
· 12-06 12:34
The code-defined rules sound good, but can the burn mechanism really support the price, or is it just another round of “IQ tax”?
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)