#美SEC促进加密资产创新监管框架 These words carry so much weight that you have to take a second look.



Why? Because regulators never talk about the “future”—unless that future is already running smoothly within their internal systems.

Look at the SEC’s current stance: first, they question whether this thing is even legal, then they tacitly allow certain products to enter the market, and now they’re actively participating in rule-making. This isn’t just a simple loosening of policy; it’s a reconstruction of the game’s rules themselves. When the world’s strictest financial regulator recognizes crypto as “foundational financial infrastructure,” the real thing to reevaluate isn’t the short-term price movements.

It’s about which projects can actually plug into the future global financial pipeline, and which are just empty shells riding the hype.

My view is clear: in the next three to five years, the story of cryptocurrency won’t be the thrill of wild price swings, but a power game over who can redraw the global financial map.

What you need to do now is pick the right track and filter for valuable projects, not just chase market sentiment blindly. Choice is worth more than impulse.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
CommunityJanitorvip
· 12-07 06:10
This move by the SEC is indeed sending a signal, but truly valuable projects are still few and far between. Can we really wait for that day in three to five years? Feels like just another round of new retail investors getting harvested. They call it foundational financial infrastructure, but to put it bluntly, they just want to rope us into their game.
View OriginalReply0
ForkItAllDayvip
· 12-07 06:09
The SEC's change in attitude is indeed worth pondering. They've shifted from cracking down to participating in rule-making, and their timing is very precise.
View OriginalReply0
FloorPriceNightmarevip
· 12-07 06:07
The SEC's actions are indeed sending signals, but to be honest, how many projects can actually connect to the financial pipelines?
View OriginalReply0
FOMOSapienvip
· 12-07 06:03
This move by the SEC is truly a breakthrough. Going from suppression to embrace shows that the era of connecting with traditional finance has really arrived.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeSurvivorvip
· 12-07 05:49
The SEC is serious this time, no more pretending. Previously, it was just verbal restrictions, but now they're directly participating in rule-making. This is indeed a strong signal. The real gold miners are those who can connect to global financial pipelines; the rest are just along for the ride. But honestly, who can really tell which projects are true infrastructure and which are just hot air? I have my doubts. In the next three to five years, there may not be many projects that survive. This shift in the SEC's attitude looks to me like paving the way for major institutions to enter.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)