Recently, I read a report that wasn't about macroeconomic policy or trending social gossip, but about a reality that's unfolding right now—a reality few are willing to face.
Gen Z is flooding into the cryptocurrency market, and it's not about "belief" or "trends." To put it bluntly, exorbitant housing prices have backed them into a corner and forced them to adopt an entirely new survival logic: since the traditional life script no longer works, they might as well flip the table and start over.
A survey by the Financial Times spells it out: the fact that "buying a house is impossible" has completely changed the strategy for young Americans.
Save money? By the time they've saved enough for a down payment, their hair will be gray. Work harder? Wage increases will never keep up with rising home prices. Traditional financial products? The returns are laughable. Buying a home? It has shifted from a "life goal" to a "luxury."
So their reaction is direct: savings are dwindling, motivation to work is declining, and speculative behavior is on the rise—especially pouring money into the crypto market.
This isn't blind following; it's called "economic nihilism." If playing by the old rules guarantees losing, then why not try a different game for a change?
**Why are young people being pushed into the crypto market?**
Because in their eyes, "taking a gamble that might pay off" seems more like a real opportunity than "scrimping and saving for ten years."
The survey exposes a painful mental calculation: if saving diligently for ten years still won't add up to a down payment, they'd rather throw their money into assets that might double in three days.
The traditional incentive mechanisms of financial management simply don't work for this generation—
2% interest on bank deposits? 7% long-term annualized return from funds and stocks? Yet home prices are rising 10%-20% per year at minimum?
Do the math for a 25-year-old: at the current rate of wage growth, by the time they're 40, they still might not have enough for a down payment. The time cost is too high, and the opportunity cost is even higher.
So their logic is simple: instead of putting money into "safe assets" that slowly depreciate, it's better to invest in the volatile but promising crypto market—at least the latter offers a chance to change their fate.
This isn't impulsiveness; it's rational calculation forced by reality.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NewPumpamentals
· 12-07 08:53
To be honest, rather than waiting ten years for a down payment, it's better to go all in at once. Either way, it's a gamble—whether you bet on the system or on crypto, the choice is in your own hands.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoSourGrape
· 12-07 08:35
Fuck, if I had known this logic earlier, I damn well shouldn't have listened to my parents.
View OriginalReply0
ForumLurker
· 12-07 08:32
To be honest, I get the logic—rather than sitting around waiting for death, it's better to take a gamble.
View OriginalReply0
DefiPlaybook
· 12-07 08:28
Bank APYs can't keep up with inflation, and the rise in housing prices is even more outrageous. For young people, going all-in on crypto has actually become the most rational form of gambling. Honestly, this is just a helpless choice forced by systemic issues.
Recently, I read a report that wasn't about macroeconomic policy or trending social gossip, but about a reality that's unfolding right now—a reality few are willing to face.
Gen Z is flooding into the cryptocurrency market, and it's not about "belief" or "trends." To put it bluntly, exorbitant housing prices have backed them into a corner and forced them to adopt an entirely new survival logic: since the traditional life script no longer works, they might as well flip the table and start over.
A survey by the Financial Times spells it out: the fact that "buying a house is impossible" has completely changed the strategy for young Americans.
Save money? By the time they've saved enough for a down payment, their hair will be gray. Work harder? Wage increases will never keep up with rising home prices. Traditional financial products? The returns are laughable. Buying a home? It has shifted from a "life goal" to a "luxury."
So their reaction is direct: savings are dwindling, motivation to work is declining, and speculative behavior is on the rise—especially pouring money into the crypto market.
This isn't blind following; it's called "economic nihilism." If playing by the old rules guarantees losing, then why not try a different game for a change?
**Why are young people being pushed into the crypto market?**
Because in their eyes, "taking a gamble that might pay off" seems more like a real opportunity than "scrimping and saving for ten years."
The survey exposes a painful mental calculation: if saving diligently for ten years still won't add up to a down payment, they'd rather throw their money into assets that might double in three days.
The traditional incentive mechanisms of financial management simply don't work for this generation—
2% interest on bank deposits? 7% long-term annualized return from funds and stocks? Yet home prices are rising 10%-20% per year at minimum?
Do the math for a 25-year-old: at the current rate of wage growth, by the time they're 40, they still might not have enough for a down payment. The time cost is too high, and the opportunity cost is even higher.
So their logic is simple: instead of putting money into "safe assets" that slowly depreciate, it's better to invest in the volatile but promising crypto market—at least the latter offers a chance to change their fate.
This isn't impulsiveness; it's rational calculation forced by reality.