America just dropped a legislative bombshell targeting foreign censorship practices. The GRANITE Act—short for Guaranteeing Rights Against Novel International Tyranny & Extortion—is gaining serious traction across state legislatures.
Two states have already jumped on board. Wyoming and New Hampshire filed versions of this bill, signaling a coordinated pushback against what lawmakers see as overreach by European and Brazilian authorities. The core premise? If foreign governments censor American speech, they could face million-dollar penalties.
U.S. Under Secretary Sarah Rogers weighed in during a recent briefing. Her message was clear: this isn't just symbolic posturing. The framework aims to protect domestic voices from extraterritorial enforcement of speech codes that clash with First Amendment principles.
For the Web3 community, this matters. Decentralized platforms thrive on permissionless expression. Regulatory fragmentation across borders creates friction. If this legislation spreads, it could reshape how nations approach cross-border content moderation—and whether protocols need jurisdiction-specific compliance layers.
Watch this space. State-level momentum often signals federal interest.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
America just dropped a legislative bombshell targeting foreign censorship practices. The GRANITE Act—short for Guaranteeing Rights Against Novel International Tyranny & Extortion—is gaining serious traction across state legislatures.
Two states have already jumped on board. Wyoming and New Hampshire filed versions of this bill, signaling a coordinated pushback against what lawmakers see as overreach by European and Brazilian authorities. The core premise? If foreign governments censor American speech, they could face million-dollar penalties.
U.S. Under Secretary Sarah Rogers weighed in during a recent briefing. Her message was clear: this isn't just symbolic posturing. The framework aims to protect domestic voices from extraterritorial enforcement of speech codes that clash with First Amendment principles.
For the Web3 community, this matters. Decentralized platforms thrive on permissionless expression. Regulatory fragmentation across borders creates friction. If this legislation spreads, it could reshape how nations approach cross-border content moderation—and whether protocols need jurisdiction-specific compliance layers.
Watch this space. State-level momentum often signals federal interest.