2025-12-07 09:27:23

So someone actually needed permission to operate on a "permissioned" chain, and people are genuinely upset about it?

The irony writes itself. That's literally the whole point of permissioned blockchains—controlled access by design. Yet folks act shocked when gatekeeping happens on a gated network.

Wild times.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SerumSquirter

· 22m ago

Ha, this is outrageous, what are you pretending to be here, since it's all called permissioned, what else do you want?

View OriginalReply0

FreeRider

· 19h ago

Ha, isn't this just digging your own hole and insisting on jumping in?

View OriginalReply0

MercilessHalal

· 12-08 13:05

Haha, this is what you call slapping yourself in the face. Why pretend to be decentralized when you're making a chain with barriers to entry?

View OriginalReply0

SandwichTrader

· 12-07 09:57

Haha, that's funny. You want to use a permissioned chain and still think no one will control you? Isn't that just fooling yourself?

View OriginalReply0

SandwichHunter

· 12-07 09:56

ngl this is just ridiculous, you want freedom on a permissioned chain? Then why don't you just use a public chain haha

View OriginalReply0

AirdropChaser

· 12-07 09:45

Haha, isn't this just self-contradictory? Wanting the convenience of a permissioned chain but not wanting to be regulated—where in the world does such a good deal exist?

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunter9000

· 12-07 09:44

Haha, these people are really something. Why are they so surprised? They're on a permissioned chain but still want a permissionless experience? Where's their brain?

View OriginalReply0

UnluckyValidator

· 12-07 09:41

Haha, this is the typical "I want freedom but also decentralization" contradictory persona. They chose a private chain but still want the benefits of a public chain—serves them right.

View OriginalReply0

GrayscaleArbitrageur

· 12-07 09:38

Haha, this logic is really something. You want permissionless freedom after moving to a permissioned chain?

View OriginalReply0

SeasonedInvestor

· 12-07 09:31

Haha, this is hilarious. A permissioned chain still needs to be permissioned— isn’t this just nesting permissions within permissions?

View OriginalReply0