#数字货币市场洞察 How do you play staged entry? Let’s talk about the practical logic of the pyramid strategy



When the market is highly volatile, the biggest fear is going all-in and getting stuck. The core idea of the pyramid entry method is simple—split your bullets into several shots, dare to go heavier at lower positions, and focus on pacing rather than predicting the exact top or bottom.

Two paths for building positions, decided by market conditions

If you judge the trend to be upward, use a standard pyramid: suppose your first entry uses 50% of your funds, then after a 10% rise, add another 30%, and after another 10% rise, top up the last 20%. This way, your average cost is clearly lower than the current price, so even if there’s a small pullback, you won’t panic. Conversely, if you want to bottom-fish in a downtrend, use the inverted pyramid to test the waters: start by placing 20% of your position at the support level, then add 30% and 50% as the price drops by 5%-10% each time, saving the largest position for the cheapest entry. Remember one principle—the later the entry, the smaller the proportion added. Don’t let high-priced chips drag down your overall cost.

Selling in batches is the only way to truly lock in profits

After building your position, don’t just sit and wait for a moonshot—you need to plan your exit rhythm. First, calculate each entry price and fee clearly. For example, if your second batch was bought at 10.5 yuan and the fee is 0.02 yuan, the real cost is 10.52 yuan. When setting sell orders, pay attention to two scenarios: in an uptrend, place a limit order 1%-1.5% above the previous batch’s cost price (( cost 10.52 yuan, set the order at 10.65 yuan )) — after covering fees, you still make a profit; in a sideways market, don’t be greedy, just set orders ±0.5% from your cost price to break even and exit.

Here’s a detail—you must use limit orders, not market orders, as slippage can eat up a big chunk of your profits. Also, according to new regulations in 2025, your order price cannot deviate more than 2% from the current price, so be careful not to violate this when setting orders.

Stop-loss discipline is your last line of defense

No matter how smart the strategy, sometimes you’ll get it wrong. Set a hard rule: if any batch of your position loses more than 2% of your total funds, immediately stop adding; if the price breaks a key support level (( such as a previous low or trendline )), immediately stop out of the current batch and reassess your direction.

The essence of this method is to keep your cost always better than the market average, not to chase the lowest point, but to improve your win rate and risk-reward by staging your entries. Paired with staged profit-taking and strict stop-losses, you can capture trend profits without getting badly hurt by a single misjudgment.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LiquiditySurfervip
· 12-07 14:22
That's right, going all-in is asking for trouble—scaling in is the way to go. A 2% stop loss is still too loose; I usually get out at 1%. The section on limit orders is very detailed—slippage really is a hidden fee. I've tried pyramid averaging down, but the mental challenge is tough. The harder the drop, the more I want to go all-in. This strategy works for ranging markets, but when a trend hits, there's just no chance to average in. I only learned after getting stuck last year that timing is definitely more important than predicting the bottom. The new 2% rule in 2025 means you have to be even more careful with your orders. I like reverse pyramiding—leaving the heavy positions for cheap buys makes it easier on the nerves. You have to factor in fees for each batch; newbies tend to overlook that.
View OriginalReply0
FortuneTeller42vip
· 12-07 14:21
That being said, this pyramid strategy sounds good, but when it comes to actual execution, it's still easy to get carried away by emotions. Reverse pyramiding to buy the dip is the easiest way to get wrecked—who can guarantee that's really the bottom? You're right, limit orders are definitely more reliable than market orders. A lot of people really haven't accounted for fees in these details. This whole logic is actually psychological gamesmanship; only a minority can really stick to scaling in or out. Scaling out requires even more discipline than scaling in. I often want to cash out as soon as I make a little profit. A 2% stop-loss is set too tight; it's easy to get shaken out that way. Rhythm is more important than prediction—this really hits the mark. Most people actually fail because of trying to predict.
View OriginalReply0
Layer2Observervip
· 12-07 14:20
Hmm... The logic of this pyramid-style batch strategy is theoretically sound, but in actual operation, you need to recalculate slippage and fees. Don’t get boxed in by that 2% rule.
View OriginalReply0
TopEscapeArtistvip
· 12-07 14:07
It sounds great, but in reality, you end up buying at the top and getting stuck... Is that support level thing really reliable?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)