Someone just called the Fed a welfare program for PhD economists. Harsh but interesting take.



Their track record speaks volumes—consistently off the mark on inflation calls, rate predictions, you name it. The accuracy rate is honestly embarrassing for an institution with that much influence.

Here's the kicker: imagine if air traffic controllers had the same success rate. Planes would be grounded indefinitely. Yet the Fed keeps operating with zero accountability for being perpetually wrong.

Makes you wonder what exactly they're optimizing for—because it sure isn't predictive accuracy.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BTCBeliefStationvip
· 4h ago
Haha, that's hilarious. The PhD welfare department is truly something else... Their prediction accuracy is like rolling dice, yet they can still keep their jobs—now that's real privilege.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeLovervip
· 11h ago
ngl this airdrop control theory is simply genius, the Fed is basically an institution handing out benefits to PhDs haha
View OriginalReply0
liquiditea_sippervip
· 12-07 20:50
Haha, the analogy of PhD as a welfare institute is spot on... Seriously, if air traffic controllers had this success rate, their licenses would have been revoked long ago.
View OriginalReply0
GasDevourervip
· 12-07 20:47
Haha, that's hilarious. Calling it a "PhD welfare project" is truly spot on. But seriously, the Fed's forecasting ability... they really need to do some self-reflection.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)