Been testing various LLMs lately and noticed something wild - they're either overly cautious to the point of being preachy, or they're so rigid they can't handle nuance. Some responses feel weirdly detached, almost like they're overthinking every word. Then there are moments where the logic just... breaks. It's like watching someone who's simultaneously too careful and completely unpredictable. The whole experience feels off sometimes.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
nft_widow
· 51m ago
This is the true portrayal of LLMs right now—it's really awkward.
View OriginalReply0
PonziWhisperer
· 12-08 00:32
This is the common problem with large models now—they either give you fake-sounding advice or are unbelievably rigid.
View OriginalReply0
GweiWatcher
· 12-08 00:27
Lol, this is the common problem with current LLMs—everything is black or white, there's no middle ground.
View OriginalReply0
YieldFarmRefugee
· 12-08 00:26
Is it just me being bad, or are these models really showing extreme polarization—sometimes they're chatterboxes, other times they just freeze up?
View OriginalReply0
MoneyBurner
· 12-08 00:04
This LLM is like a failed crypto project—either rigidly lecturing you or falling apart logically. I’ve tested a bunch, and the more I use them, the more off they seem.
Been testing various LLMs lately and noticed something wild - they're either overly cautious to the point of being preachy, or they're so rigid they can't handle nuance. Some responses feel weirdly detached, almost like they're overthinking every word. Then there are moments where the logic just... breaks. It's like watching someone who's simultaneously too careful and completely unpredictable. The whole experience feels off sometimes.