North American crypto treasury companies' stock prices have generally fallen 43% this year: SharpLink's market cap is actually less than its wallet balance
[Chain News] This year hasn’t been easy for crypto treasury companies. Data shows that the median share price of such publicly listed firms in North America has more than halved—down 43%. In comparison, Bitcoin has only dropped around 6% this year, making this divergence a reason to re-examine the true value of these so-called “on-chain treasuries.”
The worst case is SharpLink. This company abruptly pivoted from gaming to hoarding Ethereum, and its stock price once surged 2600% in just a few days. But the good times didn’t last—since its peak, the stock has plummeted 86%. What’s even more embarrassing is that the company’s market cap is actually less than the value of the ETH in its wallet, with its stock trading at just 0.9 times the value of its holdings.
Greenlane is even more outrageous. Despite holding $48 million in BERA tokens, its stock price has still crashed by over 99% this year. Then there’s WLFI treasury company Alt5 Sigma, tied to Trump’s son, which has also dropped 86% since June.
So, what’s the problem? Many companies have avoided the “big ship” of Bitcoin and instead bet on small-cap, high-volatility tokens. When the market corrected, leverage turned those bets into blow-ups. For lesser-known treasuries, falling token prices meant even fewer fundraising opportunities and a collapse in investor enthusiasm.
While a few companies’ market caps are still above the value of their holdings, most investors who bought at the top are now trapped. At this rate, 70% of DAT companies are likely to close the year with share prices lower than where they started. This round of moves is a textbook example of wealth redistribution.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasWaster
· 19h ago
SharpLink is really incredible. Its market value is not even as valuable as the coins in its own wallet. What kind of failure is that?
---
The stock price of the company holding coins is actually falling even more sharply than the coins themselves? That logic is truly absurd.
---
Wait, the company's market capitalization is 0.9 times the value of its holdings? Isn't that just giving away money to retail investors for free?
---
Greenlane holding $48 million can still drop 99%. How many black swan events would that require?
---
So these "treasury" companies haven't created any value for shareholders at all, just pure arbitrage and chopping the leeks.
---
A 2600% surge followed by an 86% evaporation. This move is really impressive.
---
I can't understand why anyone is still buying these companies' stocks. Isn't it better to just buy the coins?
---
Alt5 Sigma still needs Trump's favor to be saved, and it can't even do that. That's hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
LuckyBlindCat
· 12-08 01:30
Haha, SharpLink really played itself into a "negative premium" oddity.
These so-called coin-hoarding companies really have a gambler's mentality. They've dropped much harder than BTC, which shows the market doesn't buy into it at all.
BERA holds so much and still dropped 99%—that's some serious self-sabotage.
View OriginalReply0
WalletDetective
· 12-08 01:29
Haha, SharpLink’s move is wild—their market cap is even lower than their own wallet. How weak can you get?
These coin-hoarding companies are actually underperforming BTC. What does that say... maybe management really is the problem.
Greenlane is holding $48 million in BERA and still dropped 99%. That takes some serious skill to mess up that badly.
These listed companies would be better off just holding coins directly, instead of getting fleeced in the stock market.
Why bother rebranding as a treasury company? Why not just admit they’re hoarding coins?
SharpLink’s story is absurd—pivoting from gaming to coin hoarding. This script is written for retail investors, isn’t it?
This spread is insane; coin prices drop 6% and they drop 43%. Investors are speechless.
Feels like the whole on-chain treasury concept is just a smokescreen these days—totally lacking imagination.
Instead of buying these public company stocks, it’s more reliable to just run contracts and hoard coins yourself.
I doubt WLFI, the one Trump’s son endorses, will work out either. Projects with celebrity faces never amount to anything.
View OriginalReply0
CoffeeOnChain
· 12-08 01:26
Damn, SharpLink's move is hilarious. Its market cap is worth less than my own wallet. Isn't this a textbook example of what not to do?
View OriginalReply0
MidnightTrader
· 12-08 01:23
These treasury companies are really helping us prove a point: hoarding tokens is not as good as just buying coins directly.
SharpLink is even more extreme—the market cap is actually discounted to 0.9 times the value of its holdings. What kind of logic is that... Basically, it means management's premium is negative.
Greenlane is holding $48 million worth of BERA and still manages to crash like this. I really want to know—is it the tokens that suck, or are the people even worse?
These listed companies have actually become the best tools for shorting crypto. Hilarious.
If you want to pivot, at least pick the right direction. Going straight from the gaming industry to hoarding tokens—how bizarre does your thinking have to be to come up with that?
Bitcoin is down 6% for the year, but these listed treasury companies are down 43%+. That's the difference right there.
Instead of trusting some on-chain treasury, it's better to keep your coins safe in your own wallet.
View OriginalReply0
ForkItAllDay
· 12-08 01:13
This is hilarious, hoarding companies are actually worse off than simply holding coins directly. The logic is totally absurd.
SharpLink's move is wild, its market cap is less than the value of its wallet. Feels like they're just fleecing retail investors.
Greenlane's 48 million BERA dropped 99%—that's some serious messing around.
These "on-chain treasuries" are really just advanced retail investor fleecing machines. Buying their stock is worse than just HODLing yourself.
They managed to make the market cap nesting doll game go negative. Full marks for creativity.
North American crypto treasury companies' stock prices have generally fallen 43% this year: SharpLink's market cap is actually less than its wallet balance
[Chain News] This year hasn’t been easy for crypto treasury companies. Data shows that the median share price of such publicly listed firms in North America has more than halved—down 43%. In comparison, Bitcoin has only dropped around 6% this year, making this divergence a reason to re-examine the true value of these so-called “on-chain treasuries.”
The worst case is SharpLink. This company abruptly pivoted from gaming to hoarding Ethereum, and its stock price once surged 2600% in just a few days. But the good times didn’t last—since its peak, the stock has plummeted 86%. What’s even more embarrassing is that the company’s market cap is actually less than the value of the ETH in its wallet, with its stock trading at just 0.9 times the value of its holdings.
Greenlane is even more outrageous. Despite holding $48 million in BERA tokens, its stock price has still crashed by over 99% this year. Then there’s WLFI treasury company Alt5 Sigma, tied to Trump’s son, which has also dropped 86% since June.
So, what’s the problem? Many companies have avoided the “big ship” of Bitcoin and instead bet on small-cap, high-volatility tokens. When the market corrected, leverage turned those bets into blow-ups. For lesser-known treasuries, falling token prices meant even fewer fundraising opportunities and a collapse in investor enthusiasm.
While a few companies’ market caps are still above the value of their holdings, most investors who bought at the top are now trapped. At this rate, 70% of DAT companies are likely to close the year with share prices lower than where they started. This round of moves is a textbook example of wealth redistribution.