Farcaster's Major Transformation: Abandoning Social to Pivot to Wallets, Going All In on Trading Features

robot
Abstract generation in progress

[Farcaster] is changing direction? Their co-founder Dan Romero recently made it official: they’re going all in on wallets.

Honestly, this is a pretty big shift. They previously focused hard on the social track, spending four and a half years on it, only to realize that path wasn’t really working. Meanwhile, the wallet business has been quietly growing—data doesn’t lie. Since users have voted with their feet, why hesitate?

Romero made it clear this time: “The product is now serving wallet users.” And in their view, what’s the core function of a wallet? Transactions. It’s that simple and straightforward.

Of course, they’re not making it mandatory. If you want to use Farcaster’s other features without touching the wallet, go ahead. But the team’s effort and resources will be focused on wallets and transactions from now on. New features and product positioning will all revolve around this.

Will this move from social to wallets work out? The market will give the answer.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
HalfBuddhaMoneyvip
· 5h ago
After four and a half years of struggling with social features and still not making it work, now they're all in on wallet transactions. That’s quite a sudden pivot. To put it bluntly, it’s the pressure from the data—users voted with their feet.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHuntervip
· 7h ago
Four and a half years of wasted effort, there's really nothing you can do in the face of data. Wallet transactions are truly the way to go. How many gas wars would it take to see this?
View OriginalReply0
ChainWallflowervip
· 12-08 02:10
Switching tracks after four and a half years, that must be so awkward, haha. I just want to ask, with the wallet track being so competitive, can Farcaster really come out on top? To put it bluntly, it's still because they haven't succeeded in social. Is this a forced move, or do they really want to make a wallet?
View OriginalReply0
GamefiGreenievip
· 12-08 02:05
Damn, four and a half years of social dreams shattered, and now we're betting on wallets? Alright then, everyone is equal in the face of data.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiCaffeinatorvip
· 12-08 01:59
Four and a half years of wasted effort, suddenly switching tracks—this move seems a bit rushed. Can you really make the transition?
View OriginalReply0
EyeOfTheTokenStormvip
· 12-08 01:57
Another project has switched tracks; to put it bluntly, the social sector is too competitive to make any real gains. But from a data perspective, wallet transactions are indeed the main track right now, and user retention is definitely better. The problem is, competition is fierce—giants like Uniswap and OKX have already staked their claims. Can Farcaster make a comeback? It all depends on execution.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroHerovip
· 12-08 01:51
Four and a half years struggling with social networking, is it really time to admit defeat this time? But switching to wallets is actually pretty realistic, after all, the data speaks for itself.
View OriginalReply0
governance_ghostvip
· 12-08 01:41
Four and a half years wasted? LOL, numbers always speak the truth.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)