2025-12-08 02:41:36

#比特币对比代币化黄金 To be honest, gold tokenization is basically just a conceptual game. Think about it: you’re still using fiat currency for transactions. The only real change is that the credit backing shifts from the government to physical gold.

When you spend money to buy a so-called 1-ounce gold token, what you actually get is a digital certificate, not real gold. But Bitcoin is different—when you buy 1 BTC, you truly own 1 BTC. That’s real asset ownership.

So here’s the question: if the medium of exchange is still paper money and only the collateral behind it has changed its appearance, what problem does this kind of tokenization actually solve? Or is it just putting a blockchain disguise on traditional finance?

BTC0.19%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AltcoinHunter

· 18h ago

I think this logic doesn't really hold up. Bitcoin is also a digital certificate, and it's also supported by consensus, isn't it?

View OriginalReply0

StableNomad

· 12-08 03:10

ngl this is exactly what happened with UST... swapping one custodian risk for another doesn't actually solve anything, statistically speaking. the correlation coefficient between tokenized gold and fiat still hovers around 0.98 lmao

Reply0

Liquidated_Larry

· 12-08 03:09

Tokenized gold is just an intermediary fee harvesting machine disguised with a blockchain skin, and you still have to trust third-party custodians—it's no different from before.

View OriginalReply0

SerumSquirrel