Programmable money sounds revolutionary, right? We've been hearing about it for years. But here's the thing—it still doesn't work the way real finance demands.



Even chains that pride themselves on speed? Developers are stuck patching together workarounds—bundlers, bots, off-chain scripts that could break any second. And for what? Just to handle something basic like distributing yield across thousands of wallets.

The vision was seamless financial automation. The reality? A maze of fragile duct-tape solutions. Why is a simple task still this complicated?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
WhaleWatchervip
· 13h ago
To put it bluntly, it's just empty talk on paper. When it comes to actual use, it's still a bunch of duct tape.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeWhisperervip
· 12-08 11:56
To be honest, I'm tired of hearing about this "programmable money" narrative. In the end, it's still a bunch of broken bandaid solutions—hilarious. Bundlers and bots are just robbing Peter to pay Paul, all just to distribute some yield? This efficiency is still light years away from real finance.
View OriginalReply0
RugpullSurvivorvip
· 12-08 11:43
This is the reality. After all these years of talking about programmable currency, there's still nothing to show for it. Bundler on top of bundler, it's hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)