Ripple’s $500 million equity financing round last November had some interesting terms.
The investors in this round got two key protections: first, a guaranteed buyback right. If things go south, they can sell their shares back to Ripple at a pre-agreed price that ensures a certain return. Second, priority rights—if Ripple goes bankrupt, is liquidated, or gets acquired, these investors get first dibs when it comes to payouts and decision-making.
The lead investors are major players from traditional finance—Citadel Securities and Fortress are both involved. This kind of deal structure isn’t common in the crypto industry; it’s more reminiscent of the traditional VC playbook.
To put it bluntly: I’ll give you money, but you have to cover the downside risk, and I want to share in the upside gains. For Ripple, getting these Wall Street institutions to invest is a strong vote of confidence, but it comes at the cost of giving up significant control and financial flexibility.
The timing of this round is also notable—it happened right when the SEC lawsuit was still unresolved and XRP market expectations were fluctuating. The fact that traditional capital was willing to come in at this point is, in a way, a real-money vote of confidence in Ripple’s long-term value.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeWhisperer
· 20h ago
Those old foxes on Wall Street are really cunning. They’re offloading the downside risk onto Ripple while keeping the upside for themselves. Traditional finance has been playing this trick for decades.
View OriginalReply0
StakeOrRegret
· 12-08 11:59
These Wall Street guys are really ruthless. They make Ripple take all the downside risk, keep the upside for themselves, and still want to have the say. Everyone would want to make a deal like this.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-6bc33122
· 12-08 11:42
These protective clauses from Wall Street are indeed tough. Ripple is essentially shouldering all the risk. Whether this deal is worthwhile depends on how things develop going forward.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoTarotReader
· 12-08 11:39
Wall Street really knows how to play this game—Ripple is completely under their control.
---
So, Ripple has been totally cornered? Priority rights, guaranteed buybacks... Why does it feel like the financial giants have slapped a golden handcuff on them?
---
This is what you call “powered by love”—the love of XRP retail holders exchanged for Citadel’s insurance policy.
---
Wait, all the downside risk is on Ripple? How is this even financing? This is basically a disguised acquisition.
---
Interesting, interesting. More and more traditional finance players are coming in—this shows XRP is still valuable.
---
Call it a vote of confidence if you want, but honestly, it just means someone’s got them by the neck.
View OriginalReply0
Deconstructionist
· 12-08 11:30
This Wall Street trick, Ripple has really taken it to another level.
They take on all the risk themselves, yet still have to split half the profits with others—how is this even called financing...
But on the other hand, the Citadel folks daring to enter the market before the SEC lawsuit is fully settled does show they’re quite optimistic.
Ripple’s $500 million equity financing round last November had some interesting terms.
The investors in this round got two key protections: first, a guaranteed buyback right. If things go south, they can sell their shares back to Ripple at a pre-agreed price that ensures a certain return. Second, priority rights—if Ripple goes bankrupt, is liquidated, or gets acquired, these investors get first dibs when it comes to payouts and decision-making.
The lead investors are major players from traditional finance—Citadel Securities and Fortress are both involved. This kind of deal structure isn’t common in the crypto industry; it’s more reminiscent of the traditional VC playbook.
To put it bluntly: I’ll give you money, but you have to cover the downside risk, and I want to share in the upside gains. For Ripple, getting these Wall Street institutions to invest is a strong vote of confidence, but it comes at the cost of giving up significant control and financial flexibility.
The timing of this round is also notable—it happened right when the SEC lawsuit was still unresolved and XRP market expectations were fluctuating. The fact that traditional capital was willing to come in at this point is, in a way, a real-money vote of confidence in Ripple’s long-term value.