There's a certain logic to pulling back globally while doubling down regionally—conserve resources, maximize home-field advantage. If you're pushing an America-centric playbook, pivoting to an Americas-focused strategy makes sense on paper. But here's the thing: the execution? That's where the wheels seem to come off. The approach being taken doesn't quite match the narrative being sold. Strategy is one thing; how you actually roll it out is another beast entirely.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MEVHunterWang
· 18h ago
To put it bluntly, it's just saying one thing and doing another. I've seen this trick from the US too many times.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter007
· 18h ago
That's right, it sounds great on paper, but in practice it's a complete disaster...
View OriginalReply0
BearHugger
· 18h ago
That's right, a plan that looks perfect on paper falls apart when put into real practice.
View OriginalReply0
gas_fee_therapist
· 18h ago
To put it bluntly, it's just empty talk on paper; when it comes to actually doing it, there are problems everywhere.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBarber
· 19h ago
To put it bluntly, it's all talk and no action. This move is pretty disappointing.
There's a certain logic to pulling back globally while doubling down regionally—conserve resources, maximize home-field advantage. If you're pushing an America-centric playbook, pivoting to an Americas-focused strategy makes sense on paper. But here's the thing: the execution? That's where the wheels seem to come off. The approach being taken doesn't quite match the narrative being sold. Strategy is one thing; how you actually roll it out is another beast entirely.