Project builders need more than capital injections.
They need runway. They need believers who won't flip tokens at the first pump. They need real users, not mercenaries.
That's where Initial Wrapped Offerings flip the script.
VC money comes with a countdown timer and quarterly check-ins. IWOs? They attract people who lock tokens because they're betting on the actual product, not just the next exit multiple.
Different incentives. Different outcomes.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SignatureDenied
· 8h ago
iwo sounds good, but the real question is who the hell can resist the temptation of the first pump
View OriginalReply0
CoffeeNFTrader
· 8h ago
Locking up tokens is really the best way to filter out true believers, while the VC model is just a ticking time bomb.
View OriginalReply0
SoliditySlayer
· 8h ago
To be honest, the IWO model really woke me up. The VC model should have been phased out long ago.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeePhobia
· 8h ago
iwo sounds good, but the real question is whether the product itself is crap or not.
Project builders need more than capital injections.
They need runway. They need believers who won't flip tokens at the first pump. They need real users, not mercenaries.
That's where Initial Wrapped Offerings flip the script.
VC money comes with a countdown timer and quarterly check-ins. IWOs? They attract people who lock tokens because they're betting on the actual product, not just the next exit multiple.
Different incentives. Different outcomes.