#Binance Alpha Seeing the ups and downs of the Midnight( NIGHT) Airdrop reminds me of many similar situations I've experienced over the years. Latency and reopening are not uncommon during critical moments of a project's launch, often reflecting some real dilemmas faced by the exchange and the project party in terms of coordination, system pressure, or risk control.

Do you remember how many projects during the big wave in 2017 experienced technical failures, excessive issuance, or even direct collapse at launch? In contrast, the handling of Binance Alpha this time—identifying the problem, latency, and reopening—actually reflects the platform's progress in risk management. At least users were not silently cut off, and there was no storm of data loss.

But this also reminds us of a well-worn truth: in the initial phase of any new project, stability is often the weakest link. The design of holding 230 Alpha points to receive 600 NIGHT may seem straightforward, but once the traffic surges in, the technical debt will immediately become apparent. Historically reliable projects are often not the ones that had the smoothest launch, but rather those that continue to progress in an orderly manner despite setbacks and do not shirk responsibility.

Whether this round of adjustments can serve as proof of the maturity of the Midnight project depends on future performance. The Airdrop itself is just an overture; the key lies in whether the ecosystem can truly take root.