Regarding several project selection issues within the Tree Graph ecosystem, many community members have recently been discussing the differences in returns between Longmai and CFX. Here is a summary of some practical distinctions.

**Differences in Revenue Mechanisms**
CFX adopts a low-annualized PoS design, where holding the token yields basic rewards. Longmai, on the other hand, is an LP staking model, allowing participants to earn both liquidity provider rewards and ecosystem incentives. The linking system can also generate intergenerational income. Compared to CFX, Longmai’s diversified income structure is more complex. Although Longmai has lock-up periods, rewards are accumulated in real-time and can be withdrawn at any time.

**Market Size and Growth Potential**
Data comparison shows that the total circulating supply of CFX has exceeded 5 billion tokens, with a market cap of approximately 5 billion USD. Longmai’s total supply is set at 88.88 million tokens, with a current market cap of only around 500,000 USD. This indicates that Longmai’s market cap is relatively small, with a low base value—thus, its potential for subsequent growth multiples is greater from this perspective.

**Participation Threshold and Ecosystem Significance**
Longmai has a more accessible entry threshold, with just a few hundred USD needed to participate. More importantly, this LP staking model directly supports ecosystem liquidity, providing more sustainable ecosystem growth compared to simply holding tokens. This explains why an increasing number of participants are inclined to choose Longmai.

Overall, both projects have distinct positioning. Longmai demonstrates different characteristics in terms of revenue structure, market cap potential, and participation threshold.