From the "Decentralization Ideal" to "Sovereign-Level On-Chain"

Many veteran crypto enthusiasts have a certain sentiment: blockchain is a revolution of decentralization. But the reality is, once a technology becomes useful, mainstream systems will study, adopt, and modify it. Stablecoins are a typical example.
When a country-level research stablecoin is developed, it’s not a compromise of decentralization but an integration of the technology into its own framework. Just like the internet was initially very free, but later evolved to coexist with regulation and order.
A humorous way to put it is: blockchain idealism is like a teenager, while the sovereign financial system is like an adult — teenagers change the world, adults decide how the world operates.
From an economic perspective, digital currency tools can reduce settlement costs and improve transparency, which is attractive to any economy. Especially today, when the global payment system is highly politicized, having more tools means more initiative.
The insight for investors is: the industry is moving toward the “technological value stage,” rather than just the “narrative stage.” Truly lasting projects in the future will be closely tied to real needs.
Don’t just focus on the price; pay more attention to applications. If stablecoins become infrastructure, then the positioning of blockchain will expand from asset markets to payment networks.
This is not a story of overnight wealth, but a decade-level structural change.
So instead of asking whether the price will rise or not, it’s better to ask: Is this track becoming increasingly necessary?
——Interaction Area——
👉 Do you prefer payment applications or asset applications? #俄罗斯央行研究发行稳定币