Perle got dumped again recently—I worked so hard for half a year, only to lose money instead of making it!

Honestly, you really can't rush into new projects blindly anymore. You have to double-check everything. I painstakingly accumulated points, so will the project team "one-click dilute" them or suddenly change the rules mid-way?

To be honest, this kind of "uncertainty" that emerges mid-race is more mentally exhausting than the work itself.

I recently came across an update from @grvt_io that caught my attention as a veteran farmer. They announced in their AMA that Season 2 will add an extra 6% community allocation ratio. The most solid part? The team explicitly committed that existing points won't be affected in any way.

At first glance, this seems like just regular good news, but when you think through the logic, it's actually quite different:

Rejecting dilution: Usually when allocation ratios increase, there's often some "pie reallocation" trick hidden behind it. But this time, GRVT is expanding the "pie" itself without touching what early users already have.

Protecting "consistency": For us early participants, what we really care about isn't a few extra percentage points—it's that promise: "the sweat you put in before still counts." This kind of respect for early user value is so rare in the current market.

Emotional anchor: This update isn't aggressive shilling, but it genuinely makes you think twice about leaving. It makes your accumulated points feel heavier, and you're more willing to stick around.

While nobody can guarantee future returns, at least this "no downgrade rules" move shows the project team has vision.

In this hectic market, only protocols that truly protect user "consistency" are worth our energy and commitment.