Introduction: ROSE vs ICP Investment Comparison

In the cryptocurrency market, comparing Oasis Network vs Internet Computer has always been a topic that investors cannot avoid. The two projects not only show significant differences in market capitalization ranking, application scenarios, and price performance, but also represent different positioning strategies in the crypto asset landscape.

Oasis Network (ROSE): Since its launch in 2020, it has gained market recognition by positioning itself as a decentralized blockchain platform focused on privacy protection, security, and performance, enabling computing-intensive applications such as artificial intelligence on-chain through integrated software and hardware technology.

Internet Computer (ICP): Since its inception in 2019, it has been recognized as a decentralized cloud blockchain that hosts secure and resilient applications, websites, and enterprise systems while enabling trustless multi-chain interactions and autonomous application generation through AI capabilities.

This article will comprehensively analyze the investment value comparison between Oasis Network vs Internet Computer from multiple dimensions including historical price trends, supply mechanisms, market adoption, and technical ecosystem development, while attempting to answer the most pressing question investors face:

"Which is the better buy right now?"

Comparative Analysis of Oasis Network (ROSE) and Internet Computer (ICP)

I. Historical Price Comparison and Current Market Status

ROSE and ICP Historical Price Trends

• ROSE Peak (January 15, 2022): ROSE reached its all-time high of $0.597347, driven by market enthusiasm for privacy-focused blockchain solutions.
• ICP Peak (May 11, 2021): ICP reached its all-time high of $700.65, reflecting strong initial market adoption of the decentralized cloud blockchain platform.
• Comparative Analysis: From their respective peaks to the current date, ROSE has declined approximately 98.08% from its historical high, while ICP has declined approximately 99.57% from its peak of $700.65. Both tokens have experienced significant long-term downward pressure, though ROSE maintains a relatively higher percentage recovery potential based on current prices.

Current Market Status (December 17, 2025)

Recent Price Performance

• Market Emotion Index (Fear & Greed Index): 16 (Extreme Fear) as of December 17, 2025

Current Market Information:

• ROSE Price: Market Data
• ICP Price: Market Data

II. Project Overview and Technical Architecture

Oasis Network (ROSE)

Project Description: Oasis Network is a decentralized blockchain network built by Oasis Labs, designed to construct a blockchain-based "cloud computing platform" that achieves privacy protection, security, and performance simultaneously. The project utilizes software and hardware integration technology to enable compute-intensive applications such as artificial intelligence on blockchain for the first time.

Key Characteristics:

• Focus on privacy preservation and security
• Integration of hardware and software technologies
• Support for computationally intensive workloads
• Decentralized architecture

Token Information:

• Total Supply: 10,000,000,000 ROSE
• Circulating Supply: 7,486,274,482 ROSE (74.86%)
• Token Holders: 309,801
• Trading Pairs Available: 19 exchanges

Internet Computer (ICP)

Project Description: Internet Computer is a decentralized cloud blockchain that hosts secure and resilient applications, websites, and enterprise systems. It supports trustless multi-chain interaction and functions as a "self-writing cloud" where AI automatically creates market-oriented applications based on user chat instructions. The ICP token is burned when conducting on-chain computations.

Key Characteristics:

• Decentralized cloud computing platform
• Support for multi-chain token processing
• AI-assisted application development
• Enterprise-grade system hosting
• Token burn mechanism for on-chain computation

Token Information:

• Total Supply: 543,709,789 ICP (no maximum supply limit)
• Current Circulating Supply: 543,709,789 ICP (100% of current supply)
• Inflation Mechanism: Annual inflation rate decreases from 10% in year one to a minimum of 5%
• Trading Pairs Available: 45 exchanges

III. Network Activity and Market Participation

ROSE Network Metrics

• Market Share: 0.0036% of total cryptocurrency market capitalization
• Fully Diluted Valuation (FDV): $114,700,000
• Market Cap to FDV Ratio: 74.86%
• Exchange Listings: 19 centralized exchanges
• Active Holders: 309,801 addresses

ICP Network Metrics

• Market Share: 0.052% of total cryptocurrency market capitalization
• Fully Diluted Valuation (FDV): $1,636,566,465
• Market Cap to FDV Ratio: 100% (due to unlimited supply structure)
• Exchange Listings: 45 centralized exchanges
• Network Status: Listed on major exchanges including Binance and Coinbase

IV. Community and Ecosystem Resources

ROSE Community Channels

• Official Website: https://oasisprotocol.org/
• Development Team: https://www.oasislabs.com/
• Block Explorer: https://www.oasisscan.com/
• Social Media: https://twitter.com/oasisprotocol
• Community Forum: https://oasisrose.garden/
• GitHub Repositories: https://github.com/oasisprotocol, https://github.com/oasislabs

ICP Community Channels

• Official Website: https://internetcomputer.org/
• Dashboard: https://dashboard.internetcomputer.org/
• Development Team: DFINITY Foundation
• Founder: Dominic Williams (Chairman and Chief Scientist)
• Social Media: https://twitter.com/dfinity
• Community Subreddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/dfinity/
• Official Forum: https://forum.dfinity.org/
• Knowledge Base: https://wiki.internetcomputer.org/
• Whitepaper: https://internetcomputer.org/whitepaper.pdf
• GitHub Repository: https://github.com/dfinity/ic

V. Market Analysis and Observations

ROSE Market Dynamics

ROSE has experienced substantial depreciation, with a 89.32% decline over the past 12 months. The token ranks 372nd by market capitalization and maintains limited trading volume at $112,532.33 in 24-hour transactions. The circulating supply represents 74.86% of total supply, indicating ongoing token distribution.

ICP Market Dynamics

ICP maintains a significantly higher market position at rank 56 by market capitalization, with trading volume of $1,057,674.11 in 24-hour transactions. Despite a 76.21% decline over the past year, ICP's broader exchange coverage (45 venues compared to ROSE's 19) and larger absolute market capitalization indicate stronger market liquidity and institutional accessibility. The unlimited supply structure reflects a deflationary token economics model where tokens are burned during computation.

Current Market Sentiment

The cryptocurrency market sentiment index stands at 16 (Extreme Fear), reflecting significant risk aversion across the sector as of December 17, 2025. Both ROSE and ICP have declined in the short term, with both experiencing losses over the past 24 hours to 7 days.

Report Date: December 17, 2025
Data Source: Gate, CoinGecko, CoinMarketCap, and official project repositories
Disclaimer: This report presents factual market data and project information. It does not constitute investment advice or recommendations for trading decisions.

Crypto Asset Investment Value Analysis: ROSE vs ICP

Executive Summary

This report analyzes the investment value factors for ROSE (Oasis Network) and ICP based on available reference materials. Due to limited specific data on ICP in the provided sources, this analysis focuses primarily on ROSE's investment considerations, with a comparative framework structure.

I. Project Overview and Asset Characteristics

ROSE (Oasis Network)

ROSE serves as the core native token of the Oasis Network. The project positions itself in the privacy protection and decentralized computing landscape, representing an emerging segment within the cryptocurrency ecosystem.

ICP (Internet Computer Protocol)

Limited substantive information regarding ICP's fundamental characteristics was available in the provided reference materials. Analysis of this asset requires additional source documentation.

II. Core Factors Influencing ROSE and ICP Investment Value

Market Trend and Valuation Metrics

ROSE Investment Considerations:

• Market Fundamentals: Investment decisions require comprehensive evaluation of overall cryptocurrency market trends, project fundamental information, current market capitalization valuation levels, and current price positioning relative to historical ranges
• Valuation Assessment: Critical factors include whether current market capitalization reflects overvaluation and whether entry price points align with reasonable acquisition costs
• Price History: Historical price patterns and cyclical behavior provide context for current valuation levels

Technical Development and Ecosystem Evolution

ROSE's Technical Foundation:

• Privacy and Decentralization: Oasis Network emphasizes privacy protection mechanisms and decentralized infrastructure, differentiating it from mainstream blockchain platforms
• Future Performance Drivers: Project advancement will be influenced by multiple dimensions:
  • Technical infrastructure development
  • Market demand for privacy-focused solutions
  • Regulatory policy environment
  • Competitive positioning

Market Consensus and Chip Distribution

Price Formation Mechanisms:

The cryptocurrency market exhibits unique price dynamics distinct from traditional asset classes. Core pricing factors include:

• Community Consensus: Strength and alignment of community support
• Chip Distribution: Concentration and distribution patterns of token holdings among market participants
• Market Speculation: Absence of tangible asset backing creates reliance on market-driven valuation mechanisms

III. Investment Analysis Framework

Key Evaluation Dimensions

When assessing ROSE investment potential, consider:

I. Cryptocurrency market overall trend direction II. Project fundamental information and development roadmap III. Current market capitalization relative to intrinsic value IV. Current price positioning within historical and projected ranges V. Regulatory environment evolution VI. Market demand sustainability for the project's core value proposition

Risk Considerations

• Cryptocurrency assets operate without underlying tangible asset collateral
• Price determination relies substantially on market sentiment and speculation rather than fundamental cash flow
• Regulatory uncertainty presents ongoing policy risks
• Competitive dynamics within the privacy-focused blockchain sector

IV. Data Limitations and Analytical Constraints

The provided reference materials contain limited substantive information regarding:

• Specific tokenomics mechanisms (supply schedules, inflation rates, distribution models)
• Institutional adoption metrics and holdings data
• Detailed regulatory frameworks by jurisdiction
• Comparative ecosystem development metrics
• Macroeconomic correlation analysis

Note: This analysis strictly adheres to information present in source materials. Speculative projections and unsupported extrapolations have been deliberately excluded to maintain analytical integrity.

Conclusion

Investment evaluation of ROSE and ICP requires dynamic assessment incorporating market conditions, technical development trajectories, regulatory evolution, and macroeconomic factors. Investors should conduct comprehensive due diligence beyond this framework, incorporating current market data, regulatory updates, and project development milestones prior to investment decisions.

III. 2025-2030 Price Forecasts: ROSE vs ICP

Short-term Forecast (2025)

• ROSE: Conservative $0.0090534-$0.01146 | Optimistic $0.01146-$0.0151272
• ICP: Conservative $2.46902-$3.011 | Optimistic $3.011-$3.6132

Mid-term Forecast (2027-2028)

• ROSE may experience consolidation phase with modest growth, projected price range $0.0123397842-$0.0174943776
• ICP may enter recovery and expansion phase, projected price range $3.17464785-$5.3792644125
• Key drivers: Institutional capital inflows, Exchange-Traded Products (ETFs), Ecosystem development initiatives

Long-term Forecast (2029-2030)

• ROSE: Base case $0.01362490243452-$0.017467823634 | Bullish case $0.02375624014224-$0.023085475714694
• ICP: Base case $3.400797857904562-$4.84133797125 | Bullish case $5.9548457046375-$6.423729287153062

View detailed ROSE and ICP price forecasts

Disclaimer: This analysis is based on historical data and prediction models. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile and subject to regulatory, technological, and macroeconomic uncertainties. Price forecasts are not investment advice and should not be used as the sole basis for investment decisions. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Investors should conduct thorough due diligence and consult with financial advisors before making investment decisions.

ROSE:

ICP:

Comparative Investment Analysis: ROSE vs ICP

IV. Investment Strategy Comparison: ROSE vs ICP

Long-term vs Short-term Investment Strategies

• ROSE: Suited for investors focused on privacy-preservation technological adoption and decentralized computing ecosystem development. Longer investment horizons may benefit from potential market recognition of privacy-focused blockchain solutions as regulatory frameworks evolve.

• ICP: Suited for investors seeking exposure to decentralized cloud computing infrastructure and AI-assisted application development paradigms. The broader exchange coverage and higher market capitalization provide relatively greater liquidity for both short and long-term positioning.

Risk Management and Asset Allocation

• Conservative Investors: ROSE 20% vs ICP 80% — Emphasizing ICP's higher market liquidity and established exchange accessibility while maintaining smaller exposure to ROSE's higher volatility profile.

• Aggressive Investors: ROSE 40% vs ICP 60% — Accepting elevated volatility exposure through ROSE's concentrated market position while maintaining ICP as portfolio ballast.

• Hedging Instruments: Stablecoin reserves for volatility dampening, diversified exchange-traded crypto baskets for sector-wide exposure diversification, cross-pair trading strategies to manage single-asset concentration risk.

V. Comparative Risk Analysis

Market Risk

• ROSE: Extreme illiquidity relative to market capitalization ($114.7 million market cap with only $112,532.33 daily trading volume) creates substantial price impact risk for position entry and exit. Limited institutional adoption and 98.08% decline from historical peak indicate reduced market consensus. Concentrated holder base (309,801 addresses) presents concentration risk.

• ICP: Despite significant 99.57% decline from peak valuation, maintains substantially higher absolute liquidity ($1,057,674.11 daily volume) and broader market infrastructure (45 exchange listings). Higher market ranking (#56 vs #372) indicates greater market acceptance, though absolute price remains substantially below historical levels.

Technical Risk

• ROSE: Privacy-focused architecture presents regulatory interpretation uncertainties across jurisdictions. Hardware and software integration requirements create technical complexity and potential operational dependencies. Ecosystem development trajectory and developer adoption metrics remain unspecified in available data.

• ICP: Unlimited supply structure with annual inflation rates declining from 10% to minimum 5% creates long-term token dilution pressure. Multi-chain interaction capabilities introduce cross-chain protocol dependency risks. AI-assisted application generation mechanisms lack established security audit precedents.

Regulatory Risk

• Global Policy Environment: Privacy-focused cryptocurrency projects face heightened regulatory scrutiny across major jurisdictions (European Union, United States, Asia-Pacific regions) regarding anti-money laundering compliance and financial surveillance capabilities.

• Jurisdiction-Specific Impacts: Decentralized cloud computing platforms may encounter infrastructure classification challenges as regulatory frameworks evolve regarding computing service licensing requirements and data residency mandates.

• Comparative Exposure: ROSE's explicit privacy positioning creates elevated regulatory uncertainty relative to ICP's infrastructure-focused positioning, though both face emerging regulatory classification challenges.

VI. Conclusion: Which Is the Better Buy?

📌 Investment Value Summary:

ROSE Advantages:

• Emerging privacy-preservation market segment positioning in evolving regulatory landscape
• Lower absolute price entry point ($0.01147) suitable for speculative small positions
• Focused technical architecture targeting computationally intensive applications

ICP Advantages:

• Superior market liquidity (9.4x higher daily trading volume than ROSE)
• Significantly broader institutional accessibility (45 exchange listings vs 19)
• Higher market ranking (#56) reflecting broader community consensus
• Established infrastructure positioning with multi-chain capabilities
• Deflationary token economics through computation-based burn mechanisms

✅ Investment Recommendations:

• Beginner Investors: Allocate capital toward ICP as primary cryptocurrency exposure due to substantially higher liquidity, broader exchange accessibility, and lower execution risk for entry and exit transactions. Avoid ROSE until market liquidity metrics demonstrate material improvement.

• Experienced Investors: Implement core ICP position (60-70% allocation) as stable portfolio component, with discretionary ROSE allocation (30-40%) contingent upon documented ecosystem development milestones and regulatory clarity regarding privacy-focused blockchain applications. Employ position sizing that reflects extreme liquidity constraints for ROSE.

• Institutional Investors: ICP presents materially superior infrastructure for institutional-scale position management through 45-venue exchange ecosystem and higher absolute market capitalization. ROSE remains unsuitable for material institutional positions given liquidity profile and concentration risk characteristics.

⚠️ Risk Disclaimer: Cryptocurrency markets exhibit extreme volatility, with both ROSE and ICP demonstrating 76-89% annual declines and current market sentiment at Extreme Fear levels (Index: 16). This analysis does not constitute investment advice. Both assets present substantial downside risk exposure. Investors must conduct independent due diligence, evaluate individual risk tolerance, and consult qualified financial advisors before capital allocation decisions. Historical price performance does not guarantee future results. Regulatory policy changes, technological failures, and market sentiment shifts present material risks to both asset classes. None

Frequently Asked Questions: ROSE vs ICP Investment Comparison

FAQ

Q1: What are the key differences between ROSE and ICP in terms of current market positioning?

A: ROSE ranks #372 with a market capitalization of $114.7 million and focuses on privacy-protection and decentralized computing, while ICP ranks #56 with a market capitalization of $1.64 billion and positions itself as a decentralized cloud computing platform. ICP maintains significantly higher market liquidity with $1.06 million in daily trading volume compared to ROSE's $112,532, and is listed on 45 exchanges versus ROSE's 19 venues. This represents a 9.4x liquidity advantage for ICP.

Q2: How have ROSE and ICP performed since their historical peaks?

A: Both tokens have experienced substantial long-term depreciation. ROSE declined approximately 98.08% from its January 2022 peak of $0.597, while ICP declined approximately 99.57% from its May 2021 peak of $700.65. Over the past 12 months specifically, ROSE declined 89.32% and ICP declined 76.21%, indicating both assets remain under significant downward pressure as of December 2025.

Q3: What are the fundamental differences in token economics between ROSE and ICP?

A: ROSE has a total supply of 10 billion tokens with 7.49 billion currently circulating (74.86% distribution). ICP maintains an unlimited supply structure with annual inflation rates declining from 10% in year one to a minimum of 5%, creating long-term token dilution pressure. Additionally, ICP implements a deflationary burn mechanism where tokens are consumed during on-chain computations, distinguishing it from ROSE's distribution model.

Q4: Which asset presents lower execution risk for investors?

A: ICP presents substantially lower execution risk due to its 45 exchange listings, $1.06 million daily trading volume, and higher market ranking (#56 versus #372). ROSE's extreme illiquidity ($112,532 daily volume against $114.7 million market cap) creates significant price impact risk for entry and exit transactions. Conservative investors should prioritize ICP for its superior market infrastructure and institutional accessibility.

Q5: What are the price forecast ranges for 2025-2030?

A: For 2025, ROSE forecasts range from $0.00905-$0.01513 while ICP ranges from $2.47-$3.61. By 2030, ROSE projects $0.01299-$0.02309 (79% appreciation potential) while ICP projects $3.40-$6.42 (79% appreciation potential). These forecasts represent base-case scenarios and do not constitute investment recommendations, as cryptocurrency markets remain highly volatile.

Q6: What regulatory risks do ROSE and ICP face?

A: ROSE faces elevated regulatory uncertainty due to its explicit privacy-preservation positioning, which encounters heightened scrutiny across European Union, United States, and Asia-Pacific jurisdictions regarding anti-money laundering compliance. ICP faces emerging classification challenges regarding decentralized infrastructure licensing and data residency requirements. Privacy-focused projects like ROSE present comparatively greater regulatory interpretation uncertainty than infrastructure-focused platforms like ICP.

Q7: What allocation strategies are recommended for different investor profiles?

A: Beginner investors should allocate capital primarily toward ICP (80%) with minimal ROSE exposure (20%) due to liquidity constraints. Experienced investors can implement 60-70% ICP core positions with 30-40% discretionary ROSE allocation contingent upon ecosystem milestones and regulatory clarity. Institutional investors should focus exclusively on ICP given ROSE's unsuitable liquidity profile for material institutional positioning and extreme concentration risk characteristics.

Q8: Why does current market sentiment matter for these investments?

A: The cryptocurrency market Fear & Greed Index stands at 16 (Extreme Fear) as of December 2025, indicating significant risk aversion across the sector. Both ROSE and ICP declined during the past 24 hours to 7-day periods, with ROSE down 11.54% weekly and ICP down 13.71%. Extreme fear conditions typically reflect capitulation selling and potential contrarian opportunity positioning, though both assets demonstrate substantial downside exposure risk. Investors should account for this sentiment environment when evaluating entry timing.

Disclaimer: This FAQ analysis presents factual market data and project information derived from reference materials. The analysis does not constitute investment advice, financial recommendations, or trading guidance. Cryptocurrency markets exhibit extreme volatility with material regulatory, technological, and macroeconomic uncertainties. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Investors must conduct independent due diligence and consult qualified financial advisors prior to capital allocation decisions.