2026-01-06 18:25:56

The progress of Quai's listing is confusing. It's been months, and mainstream exchanges still haven't taken any action, resulting in the project's liquidity being forced to disperse to smaller exchanges. This is really frustrating.

The issue isn't with Quai itself. Just look at what some top-tier exchanges have recently listed— a bunch of vapor projects and things with little technical content. Meanwhile, Quai, a Layer 1 project with real use cases, is left on the sidelines.

What is the exchange's listing strategy really thinking? Not listing quality projects, but instead focusing on hype around trash coins. How does this contribute to users? Market fragmentation only drags down the overall liquidity efficiency of the ecosystem. It's really time to reassess the prioritization of listings.

QUAI-3.49%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

22 Likes

Reward
22
7
Repost
Share

Comment

Add a comment

RugpullAlertOfficer

· 01-09 13:49

Crypto exchanges are like this, really tasteless. Quai is such a solid project and is completely neglected, while a bunch of worthless tokens launch and start grabbing market share—ridiculous.

View OriginalReply0

LightningHarvester

· 01-09 00:07

Crypto exchanges are just like that—driven by profit. Whoever pays faster gets listed.

View OriginalReply0

ponzi_poet

· 01-07 11:47

The people at the exchange are just pretending to sleep. Projects like Quai, which are truly technical, are being neglected. It's hilarious.

View OriginalReply0

ZKProofster

· 01-06 18:55

honestly, the listing game is just proof of how broken exchange incentive structures really are. they optimize for quick volume spikes, not protocol robustness—technically speaking, it's backwards af. quai's sharding implementation deserves mainnet liquidity concentration, not this fragmented mess across tier-3 exchanges. but here we are.

Reply0

ReverseTradingGuru

· 01-06 18:52

It's outrageous. I haven't heard of those crappy projects on major exchanges, but genuine ones like Quai are being neglected.

View OriginalReply0

SurvivorshipBias

· 01-06 18:50

This is the virtue of an exchange—money talks. No matter how awesome Quai is, you still have to pay to play.

View OriginalReply0

TxFailed

· 01-06 18:27

nah this is just classic exchange behavior tbh. they list whatever gets them the most trading fees, not what's actually useful. quai's scattered liquidity across shitty exchanges is literally a user experience nightmare we've all seen before

Reply0