2026-01-23 07:37:51

During that period, a certain leading wallet was also actively expanding, with very frequent actions.

To be honest, I had always used MetaMask before and wasn't very interested in other wallets. It wasn't until a certain leading wallet launched the inscription feature that I was completely impressed. Wow, they took this step too far.

I remember when the inscription feature was launched, the market reaction was particularly enthusiastic. I could clearly feel users flowing in large numbers to this wallet, and its market share was skyrocketing during that time. Maybe many people, like me, thought wallets were just wallets, but didn't expect that a feature upgrade would completely change the user experience.

Sometimes, product strength really speaks for itself, especially in this rapidly evolving market.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BlockchainDecoder

· 01-26 04:54

Data doesn't lie. I've seen the chart of market share soaring in a straight line, and it's indeed formidable.

View OriginalReply0

SmartContractDiver

· 01-25 18:27

Once the inscription feature was introduced, it truly changed my view of wallets. Product strength is the real hard power. This wave clearly shows that innovative features can directly influence user perception. Honestly, after getting used to MetaMask, I understand what differentiated competition means. Now I kind of regret not switching earlier. The migration of user traffic is the best proof; the market always votes for products that can truly solve problems. It feels like the competition among wallets is getting fiercer; you need some real value to stand firm.

View OriginalReply0

CoffeeOnChain

· 01-24 10:29

The inscription feature is really awesome, directly transforming the wallet from a tool into an ecosystem.

View OriginalReply0

GweiWatcher

· 01-23 18:46

The moment the inscription feature was launched, users left. This wave indeed caught us off guard, and there's no denying the product's shortcomings.

View OriginalReply0

NeonCollector

· 01-23 08:07

This wave of inscriptions was indeed well played, everyone is rushing over there.

View OriginalReply0

ZKSherlock

· 01-23 08:03

actually... inscriptions aren't really the innovation everyone's hyping them up to be—just data bloat on the blockchain tbh. but yeah wallet UX definitely matters

Reply0

DegenWhisperer

· 01-23 08:03

Really, when the inscription feature was launched, I was also drawn in, and the little fox was left unused. Wow, product innovation can truly change everything. It still depends on who really listens to the market. This move really impressed me, no more pretending. The market is so cruel; no matter how good the feature is, it can't escape. To put it simply, product strength determines everything. Wait, is anyone still using the little fox now?

View OriginalReply0

NftMetaversePainter

· 01-23 07:52

actually, the inscriptions feature was basically a paradigm shift in wallet interface design... the algorithmic elegance of how they pivoted from pure custody to generative functionality? *chef's kiss* that's what i call computational aesthetics meeting digital sovereignty

Reply0

BearMarketSage

· 01-23 07:50

Once the inscription was out, the little fox was truly stunned. At that time, I did feel a bit regretful for not jumping on the bandwagon earlier.

View OriginalReply0