Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Futures Kickoff
Get prepared for your futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to experience risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Michael Burry highlights the risk of massive gold and silver sales
Michael Burry, the investor who predicted the 2008 financial crisis, has issued a new warning about global markets. According to the renowned analyst, the recent decline in Bitcoin prices could trigger a cascade of liquidations in the precious metals markets, with potential losses reaching one billion dollars.
The connection between cryptocurrencies and traditional metals according to Michael Burry
In his latest post on Substack, Michael Burry highlighted how the collapse of cryptocurrencies has forced institutional investors and corporate treasury managers to seek liquidity elsewhere. His analysis suggests that up to a billion dollars in gold and silver were sold at the end of last month, coinciding with the crypto downturn. Burry believes that the rapid decline prompted portfolio managers to reduce risk by liquidating profitable positions in tokenized metal futures.
Meanwhile, Bitcoin experienced a significant contraction, briefly falling below $73,000, down 40% from its recent highs. Currently, the price is around $67,360, with a daily change of -1.46%. This movement has exposed the structural vulnerabilities of the world’s largest cryptocurrency.
The fragile fundamentals of Bitcoin in Michael Burry’s analysis
Michael Burry firmly argues that Bitcoin lacks the characteristics necessary to serve as a safe digital refuge or a credible alternative to traditional gold. According to his reasoning, there are no organic or network-utilization reasons that could halt its price decline. The absence of intrinsic, lasting value is, in his view, the real structural problem.
Furthermore, Burry dismisses the idea that recent institutional Bitcoin acquisitions can provide stable support for the price. The rally driven by the launch of spot ETFs and institutional enthusiasm is seen by the investor as a temporary speculative phenomenon rather than evidence of genuine mass adoption. In his analysis, these factors are fleeting and lack concrete foundations.
Systemic risk for companies heavily exposed to Bitcoin
One of Michael Burry’s major concerns is the impact on companies like MicroStrategy (MSTR), which have accumulated significant Bitcoin holdings. If prices continue to fall to $50,000, Burry warns, mining companies could face insolvency scenarios. The market for tokenized metal futures could also risk “collapsing into a black hole with no buyers,” leading to evaporating liquidity.
Although Burry’s bearish views have sparked intense debate in the past, his predictions have often proven to be prescient. For cryptocurrency investors, his warnings raise crucial questions about what could happen if Bitcoin’s further decline triggers a new wave of forced sales across markets.
The dynamic growth of cryptocurrencies in Latin America
While Michael Burry expresses caution about the global outlook, cryptocurrencies continue to expand rapidly in other regions. The Latin American market has seen a 60% increase in transaction volume, with forecasts reaching $730 billion by 2025. Brazil and Argentina are leading this expansion, driven by cross-border payment adoption and the growing use of stablecoins.
Stablecoins, in particular, play a crucial role in this emerging ecosystem, enabling practical use cases such as international fund transfers, receiving payments from global platforms like PayPal, and accessing financial systems beyond traditional local banking networks. This significantly contrasts with Michael Burry’s narrative about the lack of concrete utility for Bitcoin.