I recently followed a quite interesting situation unfolding in Washington. Coin Center just sent a letter to the Senate Banking Committee supporting the BRCA (Blockchain Regulatory Clarity Act) — essentially a legal protection for crypto developers.



The key point here is that this bill aims to clarify that those who write code and build blockchain infrastructure without directly holding user funds should not be considered "money transmitters" under federal law. In other words, if you develop a protocol or tool that others use to transfer money, you are not criminally liable for that reason.

The latest version was drafted by Senators Cynthia Lummis and Ron Wyden, aligning with how internet service providers are treated — those who build browsers, servers, or other tools are similarly protected. Coin Center argues that this logic makes perfect sense for blockchain developers.

But this is also a point of tension. One side wants to protect developers to encourage innovation, especially since some lawsuits last year forced programmers to face heavy penalties. The other side worries that if protections are too broad, they could weaken consumer protection laws and create loopholes for illegal activities.

Prominent cases like Tornado Cash (Roman Storm) and Samourai Wallet (Keonne Rodriguez and Will Lonergan Hill) have become reference points. Rodriguez was sentenced to 5 years, Lonergan Hill to 4 years, while Storm is still awaiting verdict. These cases show how prosecutors are approaching decentralized projects.

What I find notable is that this isn’t a direct price issue. But in the long run, if BRCA passes with clear definitions, it could reduce legal uncertainties for legitimate projects wanting to operate in the U.S. Conversely, if lawmakers tighten restrictions, some projects might relocate to other countries.

The important thing is to watch whether the Banking Committee proceeds to vote, and whether the definitions of "not holding assets" are clarified further to prevent loopholes. This is one of the policy debates that will have long-term impacts on how developers view the U.S. as a place to build blockchain technology.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments