If Bitcoin breaks through $93,000, the total liquidation strength of mainstream CEXs' short positions will reach 439 million.

GateNews
BTC1,46%

BlockBeats News, January 13th, according to Coinglass data, if Bitcoin breaks through $93,000, the cumulative short liquidation strength on mainstream CEXs will reach 439 million.

Conversely, if Bitcoin drops below $91,000, the cumulative long liquidation strength on mainstream CEXs will reach 455 million.

BlockBeats Note: The liquidation chart does not display the exact number of contracts pending liquidation or the precise value of contracts being liquidated. The bars on the liquidation chart actually represent the importance of each liquidation cluster relative to nearby clusters, i.e., the intensity.

Therefore, the liquidation chart shows the extent to which the price of the underlying asset will be affected when reaching a certain level. Higher “liquidation columns” indicate that once the price reaches that point, it will trigger a stronger reaction due to liquidity waves.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Related Articles

Bitcoin Faces Crucial Supply Test – Understanding the URPD Cluster Near $73,000

The cryptocurrency industry is currently experiencing a very high psychological and technical level of consolidation. Most of the news relating to the market will typically focus on price movement. Well-established analysts are analyzing on-chain statistics to identify the current strength of the pr

BlockChainReporter1h ago

'Bitcoin ETF Performance Pales Next to Gold': Mike McGlone - U.Today

Mike McGlone, a Bloomberg strategist, argues that Bitcoin ETFs may not drive long-term growth for Bitcoin, which has underperformed compared to gold. Despite recent gains, Bitcoin's performance seems capped, suggesting a potential peak in crypto enthusiasm.

UToday6h ago

Nunchuk Launches Open-Source Bitcoin Tools for AI Agents With 'Bounded Authority'

In brief Nunchuk released two open-source tools designed to let AI agents interact with Bitcoin wallets under strict limits. The system uses shared wallets and approval policies so agents cannot spend funds beyond defined rules. The tools aim to support automated financial tasks while

Decrypt6h ago

The U.S. government transferred 2.44 BTC to a certain CEX, worth about $177k

Gate News message. On April 10, according to Lookonchain monitoring, the U.S. government (funds seized involving Glenn Olivio) today deposited 2.44 BTC to a CEX, worth approximately $177k.

GateNews7h ago

BlackRock withdrew 2,700 BTC and 30,000 ETH from a certain CEX.

Gate News, April 10, according to Onchain Lens monitoring, BlackRock withdrew 2,700 BTC (worth $196.87 million) and 30,000 ETH (worth $67.42 million) from a certain CEX.

GateNews7h ago

Bhutan’s Bitcoin reserves are down by more than 70%, with the sovereign wealth fund DHI frequently transferring assets, drawing attention

The Royal Government of Bhutan recently transferred approximately $18 million worth of Bitcoin. Its holdings have decreased from about 13,000 BTC in 2024 to 3,774 BTC, a reduction of more than 70%. The assets are managed by Druk Holding, and the country uses hydropower to mine Bitcoin. The recent transfers may be related to infrastructure financing needs. Bhutan still remains one of the world’s major Bitcoin-holding countries.

ChainNewsAbmedia8h ago
Comment
0/400
GateUser-b26cfc28vip
· 01-13 11:31
2026 GOGOGO 👊
Reply0