Open-source project Tldraw announces suspension of accepting external contributions due to overwhelming AI-generated junk code. Such “AI Slop” severely drains maintainers’ energy, and the community is exploring the establishment of reputation systems or escrow mechanisms to address this issue.
Overwhelmed by AI-generated content, open-source project Tldraw suspends external PRs
A popular open-source web drawing project on GitHub with over 40,000 stars, Tldraw, recently announced that it will suspend accepting pull requests (PRs) from external contributors.
Developer steveruizok pointed out that, like many open-source projects on GitHub, the team has recently observed a significant increase in contributions generated entirely by AI tools. Although some submissions are correct in form, most lack complete context, misunderstand the codebase, and the submitters rarely participate in discussions afterward.
steveruizok emphasized that an open PR represents a commitment from maintainers, meaning the contribution will be carefully reviewed and seriously considered for inclusion. To keep this promise meaningful, the team must implement stricter filtering.
Currently, Tldraw’s policy is to close all external PRs first, only reopening those that are genuinely considered. This is in the best interest of the project and code quality. Although it’s regrettable to close public contributions, steveruizok stated that they will only consider reopening once GitHub introduces better management tools.
Curl and OCaml also affected, AI Slop rampant
The decision to suspend pull requests at Tldraw is just one recent example of AI Slop (AI garbage) impacting the open-source community. Similar discussions have been heating up on Reddit and Hacker News forums.
A Reddit discussion pointed out that, Daniel Stenberg, maintainer of the well-known transfer tool Curl, revealed that the project is suffering from AI-generated erroneous reports being used in a “DDoS attack.” Approximately 20% of submissions in 2025 are AI garbage content, severely consuming volunteer maintainers’ time.
Additionally, OCaml maintainers have rejected a 13,000-line pull request generated by AI, citing that reviewing AI-produced code is more laborious than manually written code, and a flood of low-quality PRs could lead to system crashes.
Discussions on Hacker News focus on issues with GitHub’s mechanisms.
Some users believe that making PR counts prominent on the page encourages a culture of submitting for the sake of data.
The current dilemma with generative AI in open-source communities stems from many inexperienced developers using AI tools to generate worthless code, expecting maintainers to merge quickly. This behavior is damaging the collaborative trust within open-source communities.
Possible solutions: whitelist or reputation systems
In response to the harassment of garbage code (Shitcode) in open-source communities, Bitcoin developer Bryan Bishop (kanzure) responded on Tldraw’s GitHub page that he had proposed to the Bitcoin Core development team to “privatize” the development process, shifting to a model limited to invited members or requiring whitelist inclusion to post comments and PRs.
Although this might violate the spirit of Bitcoin’s openness, Bryan Bishop believes that it can effectively reduce noise and useless debates caused by non-contributors, allowing developers to focus on the technical aspects and prevent valuable attention from being diverted by malicious or invalid interactions.
Besides privatization, software engineer Steve Rodrigue also suggests establishing cross-project contributor reputation systems, verifying account value through trust networks.
Another developer is working on a blockchain-based “Stake-to-PR” protocol, requiring submitters to pay a small deposit, which is forfeited if the content is deemed AI garbage, and fully refunded if it is a valid contribution. The goal is to raise the barrier to curb AI abuse.
Further reading:
AI content flood! Web3 Dictionary names “Slop” as the 2025 Word of the Year, sparking heated discussions in the tech community
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
Korea Tax Agency Moves to Secure Seized Crypto Assets
South Korea's National Tax Service plans to hire private custody providers for seized cryptocurrencies after a security breach revealed flaws in its storage system. This shift aims to enhance security and streamline asset management in light of increasing digital asset regulations.
TodayqNews4h ago
0x Report: Certain propAMM on Base Network Vulnerable to Quote Manipulation, Trades May Result in 5-10 Basis Point Loss
0x report indicates that certain propAMM on the Base network exhibits quote fraud behavior, with operators publishing false prices using Flashblock structures, resulting in trader losses. Potentially causing $500,000 monthly losses. 0x will monitor and cut off non-compliant liquidity to protect users.
GateNews4h ago
An entity claimed 40% of the ROBO airdrop through over 7,000 addresses, with an opening value of approximately 8 million USD.
According to Bubblemaps monitoring, an entity has captured 40% of the total distribution in Fabric token ROBO's airdrop through a Sybil attack involving over 7,000 wallets with consistent activity, claiming approximately 199 million ROBO tokens, currently valued at around $8 million. The related activities are unrelated to Fabric or OpenMind.
GateNews6h ago
80-Year-Old Scam Victim Lost $285,000 to Telecom Fraud, Files Lawsuit Against Charles Schwab After Funds Converted to Cryptocurrency
80-year-old investor George Chryssanthou fell victim to a telecom scam in January 2025, losing approximately $285,000. The scammers impersonated Microsoft technical support and induced him to transfer funds to a CEX account, which were subsequently converted to Bitcoin. He has filed a complaint with FINRA against Charles Schwab for failing to prevent the suspicious transfer.
GateNews7h ago
Neutrl has completed the DNS migration and resumed operations. The officials remind users to deactivate the original domain and revoke related authorizations.
DeFi protocol Neutrl has migrated to a new domain and switched DNS service providers, with smart contracts resuming normal operations. The official team ensures user fund safety, reminding users to stop accessing the original domain and to revoke authorizations for malicious addresses.
GateNews7h ago
Guizhou Police Crack Down on Virtual Currency Trading Fraud Case, Scammer Uses "Read-Only Wallet" to Steal 7118 USDT
Police in Wanshan District, Tongren City, Guizhou Province, China have cracked a virtual currency trading fraud case. The victim was defrauded of 7118 USDT, equivalent to over 50,000 yuan. The scammers used read-only wallets and cash displays to gain trust before quickly transferring assets. Police remind the public that virtual currency trading carries high risks and requires careful verification of wallet address authenticity.
GateNews8h ago
