"Gambling is not investing": U.S. lawmakers form an alliance to pressure prediction markets, regulatory disputes over platforms like Polymarket escalate

On March 3, U.S. prediction markets are facing new political and regulatory pressures. A coalition called “Gambling Is Not an Investment,” led by South Carolina Republican Congressman Mick Mulvaney, was recently formed. The organization calls on the U.S. government to strengthen enforcement, restrict the expansion of prediction market platforms, and accuses these platforms of blurring the line between investment and gambling.

The coalition states that some prediction market platforms allow users to bet on sports events or major political developments, but these activities are still considered illegal gambling in some U.S. states. In a statement, Mick Mulvaney pointed out that regardless of whether these products are called “trades,” “investments,” or “predictions,” their essence remains gambling and should comply with state and tribal gambling laws. He warned that packaging sports betting as financial products could mislead consumers, weaken existing responsible gambling protections, and impact community public service funding that relies on gambling taxes.

Meanwhile, some U.S. lawmakers are pushing for stricter regulations. Senator Chris Murphy said he plans to introduce new legislation to limit certain types of bets in prediction markets. Murphy’s statement was prompted by a recent controversial report—newly registered accounts reportedly earned millions of dollars by accurately predicting the timing of Iran’s attack on the U.S. Murphy said such incidents highlight potential regulatory gaps in prediction markets and questioned whether there is insider trading related to political or military information.

However, the prediction market industry is actively fighting back. Several industry participants have formed a Prediction Market Alliance to legally challenge enforcement actions by some U.S. state governments. These platforms argue that states are overstepping their regulatory authority, and under current laws, prediction markets should primarily be regulated by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).

CFTC Chairman Michael Selig recently publicly stated that the agency is taking steps to ensure the legal development of prediction markets in the U.S. and to maintain transparency and stability in the derivatives market. He emphasized that if any institutions or state governments challenge the CFTC’s regulatory authority, the disputes will be resolved through the courts.

Despite ongoing regulatory disputes, the U.S. prediction market industry continues to grow rapidly. Industry sources indicate that some platforms are exploring new product models, including innovative “attention markets” that incorporate AI data analysis, demonstrating that the industry is still attempting to expand its market influence under policy pressures.

View Original
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Related Articles

Polymarket pre-market prediction: WBC Australia will win. Taiwanese baseball fans learned a lesson in prediction markets.

The Chinese Taipei team lost 0:3 to Australia in their first game of the 2026 World Baseball Classic, disappointing fans. The prediction market Polymarket shows Australia's win probability at 64%. However, traditional Taiwanese betting odds suggest that the Chinese Taipei team has a 70% chance of winning, indicating the influence of supporter bias. Analysis points out that Polymarket's predictions are more accurate, reflecting the benefits of diverse participants and data analysis, and highlighting the future potential of prediction markets.

動區BlockTempo1h ago

Bloomberg: Prediction market track rapidly emerging, Polymarket, Kalshi, and Opinion form a three-way competition

PANews March 5 News, according to Bloomberg, prediction markets have experienced rapid growth over the past year, attracting widespread attention including from traditional financial institutions. The main platforms in the industry currently include Polymarket, Kalshi, and Opinion, which are seen as the primary competitors in the market landscape. The report points out that as the regulatory environment gradually becomes clearer and trading demand around macro events and hot topics continues to grow, prediction markets are becoming an important new frontier at the intersection of the crypto industry and traditional finance.

GateNews2h ago

Senator Chris Murphy questions insider trading related to Iran airstrike predictions in the prediction market, with million-dollar bets sparking controversy over "White House corruption"

U.S. Senator Chris Murphy expressed concern over prediction market trading ahead of military actions against Iran, accusing large bets of potentially involving insider information and leading to corruption that profits from war. He mentioned that certain accounts placed precise bets before the airstrikes and reaped huge profits, calling for legislation to restrict such transactions to protect national security. This has sparked widespread discussion in U.S. politics about war powers and transparency.

GateNews7h ago

Polymarket nuclear explosion contract attracts $650,000 in trading! Sparks ethical and insider controversy, official removal in emergency.

Polymarket has sparked public controversy for listing nuclear explosion prediction contracts, being accused of exploiting human survival crises for speculation. The platform removed the contracts on March 4 and is facing regulatory pressure. Analysts point out that the platform may become a channel for insider trading, threatening the reputation of prediction markets. U.S. regulatory agencies plan to further regulate prediction markets, emphasizing the need to strike a balance between ethics and legality.

CryptoCity7h ago

Kalshi refuses $54 million payout, insider trading controversy heats up in prediction markets

The prediction market platform Kalshi refused to pay users' expected $54 million payout, citing that its contract "exit" definition does not include assassination scenarios. The incident has sparked insider trading allegations against competitor Polymarket. U.S. senators plan to introduce legislation to ban prediction contracts related to government actions, arguing that such markets distort public judgment.

MarketWhisper9h ago

Forecasting market regulation framework launched! SEC and CFTC submit plans to the White House

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) have submitted regulatory proposals to the White House, focusing on the classification of crypto assets and rules for prediction markets. The SEC plans to establish token classification standards to clarify regulatory responsibilities for different types of tokens, while the CFTC proposes to develop formal regulations for prediction markets. This submission reflects significant changes in the financial regulatory process, highlighting the White House's increased influence on the regulatory agenda.

MarketWhisper10h ago
Comment
0/400
No comments