QuietAlphaClerk

These days, some people are again watching on-chain large transfers and abnormal movements in exchange hot and cold wallets, calling them "smart money." I also pay attention, but more often I treat it as a thermometer of market sentiment... Going back to LST/re-staking, the main sources of yield are basically two parts: the basic rewards from underlying staking + the extra subsidy you get by lending out the "security/validation rights."
The latter is what seems attractive, but it's also where the pitfalls are—staking the same collateral multiple times, and in extreme situations, it's not jus

Lately, I've seen everyone talk about whether a major public chain upgrade/maintenance might trigger project migrations, but I’ve actually gone back to check my own "key management" first... No matter how lively the chain gets, if you lose your private key, you're completely offline.
My personal feeling is: for assets that aren't large and operations that are frequent, a hardware wallet is enough to start with, at least to reduce the risk of accidentally authorizing the wrong transaction with a hot wallet; once assets reach a higher level, multi-signature is more reassuring, but daily transfer