09:10 Observing TRUMPUSDT: Current price 3.605, 24h -2.80%. Sentiment is cold (Fear&Greed 26). In this environment, it's easier to see "bounces that don't extend/breaks followed by pullbacks" oscillations. So I prefer to establish the framework clearly first, respond according to price levels, rather than guessing direction based on emotion.

I'm only watching two key levels: A Confirmation level 3.76900000, B Breakdown level 3.59200000. When price is below A, I treat it as a retest phase, prioritizing observation of volume and pullback speed. Only if it can effectively break above A and stabilize there does it qualify to upgrade from "watching" to "considering following." Conversely, if it breaks below B again and stays there, the short-term trend must acknowledge weakness—better to do less than to resist stubbornly.

By the way, there's been a lot of news recently on geopolitical conflicts and regulatory tone, but I only treat it as background noise, not as verified facts, and certainly not as trading signals. Narrative coins like this are more easily driven by news, so the more noise there is, the more restraint needed on position size and frequency. This is not a confirmation signal, just an observation framework.

For reference only, not investment advice.

Would you rather see it stabilize above B first before discussing a bounce, or directly break above A with volume before considering participation?