Jay Chou was scammed while playing with Bitcoin and publicly posted to look for people online?

LinkFocus
BTC-0,08%

In the Chinese music scene, the name Jay Chou (Zhou Dong) is not only synonymous with music but also a constant focus of public interest regarding his personal life and investment moves. However, a recent Instagram story filled with tension has closely linked this superstar with keywords such as “Bitcoin,” “missing,” and “betrayal,” sparking a huge uproar in public opinion. The main characters of the incident, in addition to Jay Chou himself, also include his longtime magician friend and “happy partner”—Will Tsai.

The fuse of the incident was lit when Jay Chou, on his Instagram account with millions of followers, unusually publicly called for someone. He first posted a photo of Cai Weize with the caption: “If anyone has seen this magician who has also made himself disappear, please let me know.” The teasing tone of the words already implied an unusual meaning.

Not long after, Jay Chou posted again, his tone becoming more serious and direct. He bluntly stated that this friend had disappeared for a while, giving a “bunch of excuses,” and he chose to believe it, even kindly allowing him to focus on his performance. However, this trust seemingly did not yield the expected response. In the end, Zhou Dong dropped a harsh remark: “Do you think I'm not a magician? If you don't show up soon, you're done.” This warning-laden post acted like a shockwave, quickly exploding on social media. More symbolically, Jay Chou then deleted these two limited-time posts and unfollowed Cai Weize's Instagram account, a series of actions that undoubtedly sparked curiosity about what had happened.

What kind of dispute could make Jay Chou, who has always valued friendship, tear his face in public? According to an exclusive report by Mirror Weekly, the core of the incident points to a Bitcoin investment worth over one hundred million New Taiwan dollars.

According to readers familiar with the insider information, over a year ago, it was rumored in the circle that Cai Weize helped Jay Chou operate a Bitcoin account (referred to as “代操”) that encountered problems. At that time, Cai Weize claimed that the investment account was locked for some reason, leading to the funds inside being unable to be withdrawn. In response to Jay Chou's inquiries, he stated that he would do his best to find a way to unlock it, while also “crying poor” to Mr. Chou, saying that he was also facing pressures from many creditors.

Out of trust for his friend, Jay Chou chose to give Cai Weize time to handle the situation. However, a year has passed, and not only has the problem not been resolved, but Cai Weize has also employed the tactic of “disappearing from the face of the earth,” completely losing contact. This prolonged delay and breach of trust lasted for a year, ultimately exhausting Jay Chou's patience and becoming the last straw that broke their friendship, leading to this public “online search for a person.”

As the events unfolded, some controversial rumors about Cai Weize have also been revealed. It is said that he is quite active in the blockchain investment circle, with a variety of side businesses, including investing in restaurants and deeply involved in the Bitcoin field. Furthermore, there are rumors that he once used Jay Chou's fame to claim that he knew royal nobles in Southeast Asia and even Dubai, using this as leverage to attract others to invest or take commissions from it. There are even reports that he had his girlfriend embezzle company funds to conduct blockchain investments. Although these allegations have not been confirmed, they undoubtedly cast a deeper shadow over Cai Weize's image.

In response, Jay Chou's JVR Music Company stated to the media that they “currently have no comment,” leaving the truth of the entire incident still ambiguous.

Interestingly, this is not Jay Chou's first time making headlines due to cryptocurrency-related events. Not long ago, he drew attention when his owned “Bored Ape (BAYC)” NFT was stolen, leading to significant financial loss as the valuable digital asset was quickly transferred.

Overall, an angry IG post has unveiled a complex dispute involving hundreds of millions in funds and years of friendship. This incident once again highlights the enormous risks hidden in the “agent operation” model of cryptocurrency investment - even relationships based on deep trust can become fragile in the face of enormous interests. Currently, the public is still waiting for the follow-up developments of the incident, and more so for that “vanished” magician, whether he will, as Jay Chou said, reappear before being “fully transformed” to give an explanation.

View Original
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Related Articles

Strategy Acquires 1,031 BTC in Smaller Weekly Purchase

Strategy, led by Michael Saylor, purchased 1,031 BTC for $76.6M, bringing total holdings to 762,099 BTC. This more measured acquisition follows previous larger buys and is funded through common stock sales. Current holdings are valued around $54B, about 7% below acquisition cost.

CryptoFrontNews30m ago

# Gold and BTC Diverge: A Battle Over the Definition of Safe-Haven Assets

# Woke up, and BTC pulled back to 70k. On the drive this morning, the radio was reporting that gold came under pressure as the Fed's March FOMC meeting failed to meet rate cut expectations, erasing all gains for the year so far. Recently, geopolitical tensions in the Middle East have escalated, causing global capital markets to shake. According to classical narratives in traditional finance, geopolitical conflicts should push up gold prices—a logic rooted in gold's thousands of years of safe-haven attributes, long since becoming the instinctive reaction of market participants. Yet the market performance in March 2026 has shattered this stereotype: gold prices continued to decline, breaking through the critical support level of $4,500, while Bitcoin's decline was far smaller than traditional risk assets like stocks, displaying a certain characteristic of "relative safe-haven." This anomalous divergence, on the surface is a difference in asset price movements, but at a deeper level reflects a structural change long overlooked by the market: the investor base for gold and Bitcoin is undergoing a fundamental shift

金色财经_33m ago

Wall Street broker Bernstein calls bitcoin bottom, keeps $150,000 year-end target

Wall Street broker Bernstein sees Bitcoin likely at its bottom, targeting $150,000 by year-end. Analyst Gautam Chhugani cites strong demand and institutional interest, while emphasizing resilient assets like Strategy (MSTR) as a Bitcoin proxy amidst market volatility.

CoinDesk44m ago

Bernstein: Bitcoin May Have Hit Cyclical Bottom, Maintains $150,000 Target Price by End of 2026

Gate News reports that on March 24, according to CoinDesk, Wall Street brokerage Bernstein stated in its latest report that Bitcoin may have already reached a cyclical bottom, while maintaining a price target of $150,000 by the end of 2026. The report notes that previous pullbacks were mainly driven by high interest rate environments, Middle East geopolitical risks, and ETF outflows during a certain period, but the overall fundamentals have not experienced systemic pressure. Additionally, sustained ETF inflows and corporate treasury accumulation continue to be viewed as important factors driving Bitcoin's upside.

GateNews45m ago
Comment
0/400
No comments