On February 14, news reports indicate that as the debate over the implementation of the CLARITY Act continues, the cryptocurrency community has proposed new principles to oppose the bill draft put forward by banks. The Digital Commerce Association of the Blockchain Industry Association released a set of guiding principles, emphasizing that a two-year study on the impact of stablecoins on bank deposits is acceptable, but opposing provisions that automatically generate regulatory rules.
Cody Carbone, CEO of the Digital Commerce Association, stated that the industry is willing to compromise on stablecoins with static yields similar to bank savings accounts but emphasized that crypto companies should still be able to offer rewards to customers for transactions and other activities. He called on banks to return to the negotiating table to avoid missing the opportunity to establish a fair reward mechanism.
Previously, a meeting between the White House, banks, and crypto companies did not reach a clear agreement. Banks insisted that any yields or rewards on stablecoins could undermine the deposit functions of the U.S. banking system. The new proposal from the Digital Commerce Association aims to find a balance and promote a compromise between the crypto community and banks.
Patrick Vit, Executive Director of the President’s Digital Asset Advisory Committee, pointed out that the window for passing the CLARITY Act is rapidly closing, and political focus will shift to the midterm elections. He emphasized that all parties need to remain flexible, and the advisory committee has held multiple meetings at the White House to facilitate a compromise between the crypto community and banks regarding the bill.
Analysts believe that this proposal could offer new ideas for stablecoin regulation and also highlight the complex position of digital assets within the financial system. As the midterm elections approach, the final direction of the CLARITY Act remains uncertain, but the crypto industry’s ongoing efforts to promote fair reward mechanisms may influence the bill’s details and regulatory framework.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
The UK plans to urgently halt cryptocurrency political donations, with increased regulation directly targeting transparency of funding sources.
The UK government plans to suspend cryptocurrency political donations starting in 2026 to address the risk of foreign funding interference. This measure is based on recommendations from the "Rycroft Review" and aims to prevent anonymous funds from influencing politics, requiring parliamentary approval. The policy may impact compliant crypto asset applications but is expected to enhance market credibility in the long term.
GateNews56m ago
U.S. lawmakers introduce bill to ban members of Congress, the President, and high-ranking officials from participating in prediction market betting
BlockBeats News, March 26 — According to Cointelegraph, U.S. lawmakers recently proposed a bill aimed at banning members of Congress, the President, and other senior government officials from participating in prediction market competitions.
The proposal, jointly sponsored by U.S. Representatives Adrian Smith and Nikki Budzinski, was introduced on Tuesday and is called the "Preventing Real-time Exploitation and Deceptive Insider Congressional Trading Act" (PREDICT Act).
BlockBeatNews1h ago
The U.S. President may be banned from betting on prediction markets, as the PREDICT Act has been officially introduced.
U.S. House Representatives introduce the "Preventing Real-time Exploitation and Deceptive Insider Trading Act" (PREDICT Act), aiming to ban the President, Vice President, and Congress members from betting on political events in prediction markets to prevent insider trading issues. The bill imposes fines on violators and requires the forfeiture of profits. Additionally, a legislative wave is accelerating, including actions in multiple states and other prohibition bills, reflecting public concerns about prediction markets.
MarketWhisper1h ago
Taiwan Cryptocurrency Taxation: Ministry of Finance Confirms Property Transaction Income, Failure to Report May Face Penalties
Ernst & Young reminds that gains from cryptocurrency trading in Taiwan are now subject to taxation under current income tax laws. The National Taxation Bureau is auditing transaction data, and failure to report correctly may result in back taxes and penalties. Cryptocurrencies are classified by their nature: those with security characteristics are handled under securities laws, while non-security types are included in personal or corporate income tax filings.
MarketWhisper1h ago
The U.S. plans to ban officials from participating in prediction market trading, as insider trading risks prompt regulatory upgrades.
U.S. lawmakers have introduced the PREDICT Act, which prohibits the President and senior officials from participating in prediction market trading, aiming to combat insider trading for profit. Violators will face fines and forfeiture of profits. At the same time, regulatory agencies are tightening their scrutiny of prediction markets, and several states have filed lawsuits against related platforms, resulting in stricter compliance requirements for the industry.
GateNews1h ago
Texas Court Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Pharos Cryptocurrency Developer's Exemption from Money Transmission Licensing
A Texas court dismissed cryptography developer Michael Lewellen's lawsuit, stating that he failed to demonstrate a credible threat and that the Department of Justice has taken a lenient stance on related litigation. The case was closed with a "dismissal without prejudice," allowing Lewellen to refile an amended complaint.
GateNews1h ago
