The death of Iran’s leader sparks controversy in prediction markets; Kalshi refunds $2.2 million, with the CEO claiming they refused “death arbitrage.” Before the airstrike, U.S. lawmakers demanded strict scrutiny of contracts related to war and assassination predictions, with a deadline to respond by March 9.
Kalshi’s “Khamenei Resignation” Prediction Contract Sparks Debate
Following the joint U.S. and Israeli airstrikes that resulted in the death of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, Kalshi CEO Tarek Mansour stated that their platform’s trading volume exceeded $50 million on contracts related to the event. He emphasized that their goal was to prevent investors from profiting from the death.
The contract was titled: “Will Khamenei step down as Iran’s Supreme Leader?” with rules stating that if Khamenei dies, settlement would be based on the last trading price before death. When news of Khamenei’s death broke, a surge of funds flooded into the contract, and Kalshi suspended trading due to settlement chaos.
Kalshi later admitted that the settlement terms contained ambiguous language and ultimately decided to refund users’ net losses. Sources told Bloomberg that this move cost the platform about $2.2 million.
Kalshi’s Promotion and Settlement Standards Under Fire
After Kalshi processed refunds, criticism emerged within the community, mainly because Kalshi had promoted this contract at the time of the event. Last Saturday morning, news of Khamenei’s death began circulating, Kalshi posted on X: “Breaking: The probability of Khamenei no longer serving as Iran’s Supreme Leader has surged to 68%,” which Mansour also retweeted.
Image source: X
Former SEC Chief of Staff Amanda Fischer criticized this, saying Kalshi’s actions were akin to providing a marketplace for assassination proxies.
Users also criticized Kalshi’s settlement standards, pointing out that when Jimmy Carter passed away, the platform settled his contract as “no,” accusing the platform of only applying special terms when losing money.
Dennis Kelleher, CEO of Better Markets, stated that Kalshi’s actions reveal an attempt to balance expanding trading volume with avoiding clear laws banning assassination-related bets.
Prediction Markets Cross the Line, U.S. Lawmakers Call for Investigation
Prediction markets are often seen as “anything can be traded,” but this incident highlights their limits. Before the U.S.-Israel airstrikes on Iran, California Democratic Senator Adam Schiff sent a letter to CFTC Chair Michael Selig demanding strict regulation of contracts related to war and assassination, with a response deadline of March 9.
Connecticut Democratic Senator Chris Murphy also announced he is drafting legislation to ban such market contracts to prevent insider trading and manipulation based on known outcomes. The Kalshi settlement controversy proves that such betting markets should not exist.
Polymarket’s Wordplay Sparks Controversy
Compared to Kalshi, Polymarket still hosts 187 Iran-related markets. One of these predicts whether the U.S. will forcibly remove Khamenei before March 31. Polymarket ultimately settled this contract as “no,” reasoning that the U.S. only contributed or assisted in the killing, which sparked strong dissatisfaction among some commentators and calls for dispute resolution.
Because Polymarket relies on blockchain-based decentralized settlement mechanisms, the fairness of contract judgments remains under scrutiny.
On-chain data shows that, hours before the airstrike, six anonymous wallets collectively bet on “U.S. attacking Iran before February 28,” ultimately earning about $1.2 million. These wallets were almost all newly created accounts in February, with funds transferred within 24 hours before the event. Such suspicious trading patterns have raised concerns about military secrets leaking and potential on-chain insider arbitrage.
Related report:
Pre-airstrike prediction? Polymarket traders bet on US-Iran war, earning $1.2 million, sparking controversy
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
Polymarket's "Gold will fall below $4,300 by the end of March" probability rises to 26%.
Gold prices have fallen, with the probability of gold dropping below $4,300 and $4,000 by the end of March on Polymarket rising to 26% and 7%, respectively. Spot gold is at $4,443.05, and spot silver is at $68.214.
GateNews5h ago
New Wallet Loses Over $30K on Trump and Netanyahu Prediction Market Bets
Gate News bot message, A newly created wallet spent $109K on prediction market bets wagering on "Trump out / Netanyahu out." The wallet holder has lost over $30K on these positions.
GateNews7h ago
High-probability account invests $150,000 betting that crude oil prices will not reach $200 before the end of March.
On March 26, on-chain monitoring showed that accounts with over a 93% win rate purchased about $15,000 worth of crude oil positions under $200 in the prediction market. The positions are currently flat with an expected profit of around $300. There are 4 days and 6 hours until settlement. The market is influenced by geopolitical tensions and oil-producing countries' policies.
GateNews8h ago
U.S. Congress members ban staff from trading on Polymarket and Kalshi; the PREDICT bill proposes simultaneous restrictions on government officials.
U.S. Democratic Congressman Seth Moulton of Massachusetts announced a ban on all office staff participating in prediction market trading starting March 25, to prevent the exploitation of non-public information for arbitrage. He criticized prediction markets as a playground for corrupt insiders and called for the passage of the PREDICT Act to strengthen restrictions on Congress and senior officials. Recent legislative efforts have intensified, and market platforms are also enhancing insider trading monitoring.
ChainNewsAbmedia9h ago
The U.S. President may be banned from betting on prediction markets, as the PREDICT Act has been officially introduced.
U.S. House Representatives introduce the "Preventing Real-time Exploitation and Deceptive Insider Trading Act" (PREDICT Act), aiming to ban the President, Vice President, and Congress members from betting on political events in prediction markets to prevent insider trading issues. The bill imposes fines on violators and requires the forfeiture of profits. Additionally, a legislative wave is accelerating, including actions in multiple states and other prohibition bills, reflecting public concerns about prediction markets.
MarketWhisper11h ago
The U.S. plans to ban officials from participating in prediction market trading, as insider trading risks prompt regulatory upgrades.
U.S. lawmakers have introduced the PREDICT Act, which prohibits the President and senior officials from participating in prediction market trading, aiming to combat insider trading for profit. Violators will face fines and forfeiture of profits. At the same time, regulatory agencies are tightening their scrutiny of prediction markets, and several states have filed lawsuits against related platforms, resulting in stricter compliance requirements for the industry.
GateNews11h ago
