0xLateDinner

King Charles III clearly spoke of peace, but in Russian media, it directly turns into a call for war mobilization. I suggest revisiting the translation skills.

Last night, while eating late-night snacks and watching the mempool, during congestion, your transaction actually looked a lot like waiting in line at a cafeteria: first thrown into a bunch of "waiting to be served" baskets, miners/block proposers pick the ones with higher tips first, if you pay less, it just keeps getting pushed back, and as it gets pushed back, it might even be cut in line by other transactions doing the same thing (especially if you're swapping or opening perpetual contracts, which are easy to monitor). What's more annoying is you think once you click confirm, it's done, bu

If The Telegraph’s report is accurate, the European travel chain will be rocked by an earthquake.

I've been watching the blockchain while chatting with fans recently. People keep talking about "modularization" in a fancy way, but honestly, for end users, it might just come down to two things: one is making sure transfers and interactions don't get stuck in PPT slides, and fees don't fluctuate wildly; the other is whether switching the same wallet between different chains can be as simple as changing a page. Other concepts like DAOs and execution layers, ordinary people really don't have the time to learn all that… The key is usability, stability, and fewer surprises.
And then there's the s

The Way follows nature, and candlestick charts are also a part of the Way.

This time it's different? Those who believe first will make money first.

Confidential filing, it seems like the move is to first test the market temperature.

The Gemini team is a bit panicked: if ChatGPT's image quality and controllability improve, the workflow might need to be completely reorganized.

Honestly, recently watching the supply of stablecoins on the chain increase, whenever it rises, someone starts shouting "Off-chain money is coming in = it’s about to take off," I feel a bit like laughing but don’t dare to... Correlation can be so deceiving. An increase in supply could be due to minting, chain switching, market making and stocking, or even some projects moving assets around in preparation for a launch, not necessarily new buying pressure.
The same goes for ETFs; inflows and outflows are obviously important, but they’re more like a "sentiment thermometer," not a switch. Especial

Just finished a late-night snack and was watching my positions for a bit, and I realized people are really quite strange: when I'm making paper profits, I can turn off the lights and go to sleep; when I start to see paper losses, even though I haven't closed the position, my mind automatically starts to dramatize, as if the loss has already become "certain." Basically, it's loss aversion, right? The sting of losing 1 dollar feels way worse than the thrill of earning 1 dollar.
Recently, I've been talking about rate cut expectations, the US dollar index, and risk assets rising and falling togeth

I've recently been asked how much retail investors need to understand about block builders and bundles... My own standard is pretty simple: knowing that the order you place doesn't necessarily go directly into a block, it might be "packed" and queued ahead of you, especially with large amounts / big slippage / chasing hot trends, which makes you vulnerable to being exploited. Going deeper into things like auctions, who collaborates with whom, honestly I can't remember after looking at it, and it doesn't change the fact that I just click confirm once.
Once, late at night, I was eating skewers a

Don't FOMO; wait for the pullback confirmation before getting in. Risk control is more important than the direction.

The name Pirro immediately sounds dramatic... but the conclusion is simple: not chasing anymore, Powell is temporarily safe.

The leaderboard is linked to real card usage/transactions, at least not playing virtual games; data will speak for itself.

The worst fear is not being hacked today, but that on-chain historical transactions will be retrospectively verified in the future.

Tonight I’m snacking on late-night food while browsing DAO voting records. The more I read, the more it feels like—no matter how nice and polished the proposal wording is—the incentive and power structure underneath is the real point: who puts forward proposals, who can change parameters, who receives subsidies, and who has veto power are basically all spelled out in the details. A lot of the time it isn’t “community consensus,” but rather concentrating voting power in the hands of a small number of addresses, and then using a bit of reward to coax everyone into coming over and clicking a like

TP3 is in place, thanks for the reminder, let's prioritize capital preservation first.

Don't just focus on the pattern; pay attention to the volume after the breakout and the confirmation of pullback, especially since there are too many fake flags in BTC.

No hype, no criticism; freezing is just the first step. It’s best to coordinate with more on-chain intelligence sharing to completely shut down the channel.

Just finished eating a late-night snack and browsing the blockchain, I saw someone again using the supply curve of stablecoins to explain ETF inflows and outflows. Honestly, sometimes the correlation is just a coincidence: more stablecoins might mean waiting for an opportunity, or it might just be parked somewhere else. Whether off-chain funds come in or not depends on sentiment and rhythm; it’s not something you can clearly draw with a single arrow. I now prefer to think of it as a thermometer, not a steering wheel. By the way, hardware wallets have been out of stock these days, and phishing